From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D48C83003 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568552087E for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726621AbgD2JmE (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:42:04 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:33583 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726535AbgD2JmE (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:42:04 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 8CE8668BFE; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:42:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:42:01 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Jeremy Kerr , "Eric W . Biederman" , linuxppc-dev , Linux FS-devel Mailing List , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fixup! signal: factor copy_siginfo_to_external32 from copy_siginfo_to_user32 Message-ID: <20200429094201.GA2557@lst.de> References: <20200428074827.GA19846@lst.de> <20200428195645.1365019-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20200429064458.GA31717@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:07:11AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > What do you think of this version? This one always overrides > > copy_siginfo_to_user32 for the x86 compat case to keep the churn down, > > and improves the copy_siginfo_to_external32 documentation a bit. > > Looks good to me. I preferred checking for X32 explicitly (so we can > find and kill off the #ifdef if we ever remove X32 for good), but there is > little difference in the end. Is there any realistic chance we'll get rid of x32?