From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu, adilger@dilger.ca,
riteshh@linux.ibm.com, amir73il@gmail.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+77fa5bdb65cc39711820@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] ext4: fix EXT4_MAX_LOGICAL_BLOCK macro
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 17:43:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200505154324.3226743-2-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200505154324.3226743-1-hch@lst.de>
From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
ext4 supports max number of logical blocks in a file to be 0xffffffff.
(This is since ext4_extent's ee_block is __le32).
This means that EXT4_MAX_LOGICAL_BLOCK should be 0xfffffffe (starting
from 0 logical offset). This patch fixes this.
The issue was seen when ext4 moved to iomap_fiemap API and when
overlayfs was mounted on top of ext4. Since overlayfs was missing
filemap_check_ranges(), so it could pass a arbitrary huge length which
lead to overflow of map.m_len logic.
This patch fixes that.
Fixes: d3b6f23f7167 ("ext4: move ext4_fiemap to use iomap framework")
Reported-by: syzbot+77fa5bdb65cc39711820@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 91eb4381cae5b..ad2dbf6e49245 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ enum {
#define EXT4_MAX_BLOCK_FILE_PHYS 0xFFFFFFFF
/* Max logical block we can support */
-#define EXT4_MAX_LOGICAL_BLOCK 0xFFFFFFFF
+#define EXT4_MAX_LOGICAL_BLOCK 0xFFFFFFFE
/*
* Structure of an inode on the disk
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-05 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-05 15:43 fix fiemap for ext4 bitmap files (+ cleanups) v3 Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-05 15:43 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-05-05 15:43 ` [PATCH 02/11] ext4: fix fiemap size checks for bitmap files Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-06 9:18 ` Jan Kara
2020-05-05 15:43 ` [PATCH 03/11] ext4: split _ext4_fiemap Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-06 9:22 ` Jan Kara
2020-05-05 15:43 ` [PATCH 04/11] ext4: remove the call to fiemap_check_flags in ext4_fiemap Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-06 9:26 ` Jan Kara
2020-05-05 15:43 ` [PATCH 05/11] fs: mark __generic_block_fiemap static Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-06 9:27 ` Jan Kara
2020-05-05 15:43 ` [PATCH 06/11] fs: move the fiemap definitions out of fs.h Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-05 15:43 ` [PATCH 07/11] iomap: fix the iomap_fiemap prototype Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-05 15:43 ` [PATCH 08/11] fs: move fiemap range validation into the file systems instances Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-05 16:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-06 4:16 ` Ritesh Harjani
2020-05-05 15:43 ` [PATCH 09/11] fs: handle FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC in fiemap_prep Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-06 4:17 ` Ritesh Harjani
2020-05-05 15:43 ` [PATCH 10/11] fs: remove the access_ok() check in ioctl_fiemap Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-05 15:43 ` [PATCH 11/11] ext4: remove the access_ok() check in ext4_ioctl_get_es_cache Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-06 9:32 ` Jan Kara
2020-05-07 6:24 ` fix fiemap for ext4 bitmap files (+ cleanups) v3 Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-07 14:49 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-05-07 14:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-19 8:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20 3:28 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-05-22 0:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-22 6:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-04-27 18:19 fix fiemap for ext4 bitmap files (+ cleanups) v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-27 18:19 ` [PATCH 01/11] ext4: fix EXT4_MAX_LOGICAL_BLOCK macro Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200505154324.3226743-2-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=syzbot+77fa5bdb65cc39711820@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).