From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Max Kellermann <mk@cm4all.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/io_uring: fix O_PATH fds in openat, openat2, statx
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 23:06:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200507220637.GH23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8e3c88cc-027b-4f90-b4f8-a20d11d35c4b@kernel.dk>
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 02:53:30PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I think the patch is correct as-is, I took a good look at how we're
> currently handling it. None of those three ops should fiddle with
> the fd at all, and all of them do forbid the use of fixed files (the
> descriptor table look-alikes), so that part is fine, too.
>
> There's some low hanging fruit around optimizing and improving it,
> I'm including an updated version below. Max, can you double check
> with your testing?
<looks>
Could you explain WTF is io_issue_sqe() doing in case of IORING_OP_CLOSE?
Specifically, what is the value of
req->close.fd = READ_ONCE(sqe->fd);
if (req->file->f_op == &io_uring_fops ||
req->close.fd == req->ctx->ring_fd)
return -EBADF;
in io_close_prep()? And what does happen if some joker does dup2()
of something with io_uring_fops into our slot right after that check?
Before the subsequent
ret = __close_fd_get_file(req->close.fd, &req->close.put_file);
that is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-07 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-07 18:57 [PATCH] fs/io_uring: fix O_PATH fds in openat, openat2, statx Max Kellermann
2020-05-07 18:58 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-07 19:01 ` Max Kellermann
2020-05-07 19:01 ` Al Viro
2020-05-07 19:05 ` Max Kellermann
2020-05-07 19:05 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-07 19:12 ` Max Kellermann
2020-05-07 19:29 ` Al Viro
2020-05-07 19:37 ` Max Kellermann
2020-05-07 20:53 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-07 22:06 ` Al Viro [this message]
2020-05-07 22:25 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-07 22:44 ` Al Viro
2020-05-07 23:03 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-07 23:31 ` Al Viro
2020-05-08 2:28 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-08 2:53 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20200508152918.12340-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-05-08 15:33 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200507220637.GH23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mk@cm4all.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).