From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EFAC433DF for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 11:57:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742A0207FB for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 11:57:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728217AbgEXL5K (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 May 2020 07:57:10 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:36936 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726734AbgEXL5K (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 May 2020 07:57:10 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 576A468C4E; Sun, 24 May 2020 13:57:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 13:57:06 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Al Viro Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu, adilger@dilger.ca, riteshh@linux.ibm.com, amir73il@gmail.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: fiemap cleanups v4 Message-ID: <20200524115706.GA1800@lst.de> References: <20200523073016.2944131-1-hch@lst.de> <20200523155216.GZ23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200523155216.GZ23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 04:52:16PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > Hmmm... I can do an immutable shared branch, no problem. What would > you prefer for a branchpoint for that one? This needs pretty much latest Linus' tree as it sits on top of the bug fixes merged this week. But then again I'm not sure we even need a shared tree, as there shouldn't be any conflicts. But looking at linux-next it seems Ted has actually pulled in the whole series, so I think we actually are done. But while I've got you attention: Can you take a look at my "clean up kernel_{read,write} & friends v2" series?