From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
To: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>,
Matt Denton <mpdenton@google.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
Robert Sesek <rsesek@google.com>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] fs, net: Standardize on file_receive helper to move fds across processes
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 03:24:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200604012452.vh33nufblowuxfed@wittgenstein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200603011044.7972-2-sargun@sargun.me>
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 06:10:41PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> Previously there were two chunks of code where the logic to receive file
> descriptors was duplicated in net. The compat version of copying
> file descriptors via SCM_RIGHTS did not have logic to update cgroups.
> Logic to change the cgroup data was added in:
> commit 48a87cc26c13 ("net: netprio: fd passed in SCM_RIGHTS datagram not set correctly")
> commit d84295067fc7 ("net: net_cls: fd passed in SCM_RIGHTS datagram not set correctly")
>
> This was not copied to the compat path. This commit fixes that, and thus
> should be cherry-picked into stable.
>
> This introduces a helper (file_receive) which encapsulates the logic for
> handling calling security hooks as well as manipulating cgroup information.
> This helper can then be used other places in the kernel where file
> descriptors are copied between processes
>
> I tested cgroup classid setting on both the compat (x32) path, and the
> native path to ensure that when moving the file descriptor the classid
> is set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>
> Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
> Cc: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
> Cc: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> fs/file.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/file.h | 1 +
> net/compat.c | 10 +++++-----
> net/core/scm.c | 14 ++++----------
> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
> index abb8b7081d7a..5afd76fca8c2 100644
> --- a/fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/file.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +#include <net/sock.h>
> +#include <net/netprio_cgroup.h>
> +#include <net/cls_cgroup.h>
>
> unsigned int sysctl_nr_open __read_mostly = 1024*1024;
> unsigned int sysctl_nr_open_min = BITS_PER_LONG;
> @@ -931,6 +934,38 @@ int replace_fd(unsigned fd, struct file *file, unsigned flags)
> return err;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * File Receive - Receive a file from another process
> + *
> + * This function is designed to receive files from other tasks. It encapsulates
> + * logic around security and cgroups. The file descriptor provided must be a
> + * freshly allocated (unused) file descriptor.
> + *
> + * This helper does not consume a reference to the file, so the caller must put
> + * their reference.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 upon success.
> + */
> +int file_receive(int fd, struct file *file)
This is all just a remote version of fd_install(), yet it deviates from
fd_install()'s semantics and naming. That's not great imho. What about
naming this something like:
fd_install_received()
and move the get_file() out of there so it has the same semantics as
fd_install(). It seems rather dangerous to have a function like
fd_install() that consumes a reference once it returned and another
version of this that is basically the same thing but doesn't consume a
reference because it takes its own. Seems an invitation for confusion.
Does that make sense?
> +{
> + struct socket *sock;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = security_file_receive(file);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + fd_install(fd, get_file(file));
> +
> + sock = sock_from_file(file, &err);
> + if (sock) {
> + sock_update_netprioidx(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
> + sock_update_classid(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int ksys_dup3(unsigned int oldfd, unsigned int newfd, int flags)
> {
> int err = -EBADF;
> diff --git a/include/linux/file.h b/include/linux/file.h
> index 142d102f285e..7b56dc23e560 100644
> --- a/include/linux/file.h
> +++ b/include/linux/file.h
> @@ -94,4 +94,5 @@ extern void fd_install(unsigned int fd, struct file *file);
> extern void flush_delayed_fput(void);
> extern void __fput_sync(struct file *);
>
> +extern int file_receive(int fd, struct file *file);
> #endif /* __LINUX_FILE_H */
> diff --git a/net/compat.c b/net/compat.c
> index 4bed96e84d9a..8ac0e7e09208 100644
> --- a/net/compat.c
> +++ b/net/compat.c
> @@ -293,9 +293,6 @@ void scm_detach_fds_compat(struct msghdr *kmsg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
>
> for (i = 0, cmfptr = (int __user *) CMSG_COMPAT_DATA(cm); i < fdmax; i++, cmfptr++) {
> int new_fd;
> - err = security_file_receive(fp[i]);
> - if (err)
> - break;
> err = get_unused_fd_flags(MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC & kmsg->msg_flags
> ? O_CLOEXEC : 0);
> if (err < 0)
> @@ -306,8 +303,11 @@ void scm_detach_fds_compat(struct msghdr *kmsg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
> put_unused_fd(new_fd);
> break;
> }
> - /* Bump the usage count and install the file. */
> - fd_install(new_fd, get_file(fp[i]));
> + err = file_receive(new_fd, fp[i]);
> + if (err) {
> + put_unused_fd(new_fd);
> + break;
> + }
> }
>
> if (i > 0) {
> diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c
> index dc6fed1f221c..ba93abf2881b 100644
> --- a/net/core/scm.c
> +++ b/net/core/scm.c
> @@ -303,11 +303,7 @@ void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
> for (i=0, cmfptr=(__force int __user *)CMSG_DATA(cm); i<fdmax;
> i++, cmfptr++)
> {
> - struct socket *sock;
> int new_fd;
> - err = security_file_receive(fp[i]);
> - if (err)
> - break;
> err = get_unused_fd_flags(MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC & msg->msg_flags
> ? O_CLOEXEC : 0);
> if (err < 0)
> @@ -318,13 +314,11 @@ void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
> put_unused_fd(new_fd);
> break;
> }
> - /* Bump the usage count and install the file. */
> - sock = sock_from_file(fp[i], &err);
> - if (sock) {
> - sock_update_netprioidx(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
> - sock_update_classid(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
> + err = file_receive(new_fd, fp[i]);
> + if (err) {
> + put_unused_fd(new_fd);
> + break;
> }
> - fd_install(new_fd, get_file(fp[i]));
> }
>
> if (i > 0)
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-04 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200603011044.7972-1-sargun@sargun.me>
2020-06-03 1:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] fs, net: Standardize on file_receive helper to move fds across processes Sargun Dhillon
2020-06-04 1:24 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2020-06-04 2:22 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 5:20 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-06-04 12:52 ` Christian Brauner
2020-06-04 13:28 ` David Laight
2020-06-05 7:54 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-06-09 19:43 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-09 20:03 ` Christian Brauner
2020-06-09 20:55 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-09 21:27 ` Christian Brauner
2020-06-10 5:27 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-10 8:12 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-06-10 8:48 ` David Laight
2020-06-11 3:02 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-11 7:51 ` David Laight
2020-06-10 17:10 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-11 2:59 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-11 4:41 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-06-11 9:19 ` Christian Brauner
2020-06-11 10:39 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-06-11 23:23 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-11 10:01 ` Christian Brauner
2020-06-11 11:06 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-06-11 14:42 ` Christian Brauner
2020-06-11 14:56 ` David Laight
2020-06-11 23:49 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-12 6:58 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-12 8:36 ` David Laight
2020-06-12 10:46 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-06-12 15:13 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-12 15:55 ` David Laight
2020-06-12 18:28 ` Christian Brauner
2020-06-12 18:38 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-12 18:42 ` Christian Brauner
2020-06-15 8:27 ` David Laight
2020-06-10 9:30 ` Christian Brauner
2020-06-04 3:39 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-06-03 1:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] pid: Use file_receive helper to copy FDs Sargun Dhillon
2020-06-03 1:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] seccomp: Introduce addfd ioctl to seccomp user notifier Sargun Dhillon
2020-06-03 1:10 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] selftests/seccomp: Test SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD Sargun Dhillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200604012452.vh33nufblowuxfed@wittgenstein \
--to=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gscrivan@redhat.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpdenton@google.com \
--cc=palmer@google.com \
--cc=rsesek@google.com \
--cc=sargun@sargun.me \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).