From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAD7C433E1 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 08:12:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82DC2074B for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 08:12:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726681AbgFKIMG (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2020 04:12:06 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58474 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726620AbgFKIMF (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2020 04:12:05 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BF9AC24; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 08:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quack2.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 972DB1E0390; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:12:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Jan Kara To: Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Martijn Coenen , Jan Kara Subject: [PATCH 1/4] writeback: Protect inode->i_io_list with inode->i_lock Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:11:52 +0200 Message-Id: <20200611081203.18161-1-jack@suse.cz> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.4 In-Reply-To: <20200611075033.1248-1-jack@suse.cz> References: <20200611075033.1248-1-jack@suse.cz> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Currently, operations on inode->i_io_list are protected by wb->list_lock. In the following patches we'll need to maintain consistency between inode->i_state and inode->i_io_list so change the code so that inode->i_lock protects also all inode's i_io_list handling. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara --- fs/fs-writeback.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c index a605c3dddabc..ff0b18331590 100644 --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ static void inode_io_list_del_locked(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb) { assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock); + assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock); list_del_init(&inode->i_io_list); wb_io_lists_depopulated(wb); @@ -1122,7 +1123,9 @@ void inode_io_list_del(struct inode *inode) struct bdi_writeback *wb; wb = inode_to_wb_and_lock_list(inode); + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); inode_io_list_del_locked(inode, wb); + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_io_list_del); @@ -1172,8 +1175,10 @@ void sb_clear_inode_writeback(struct inode *inode) * the case then the inode must have been redirtied while it was being written * out and we don't reset its dirtied_when. */ -static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb) +static void redirty_tail_locked(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb) { + assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock); + if (!list_empty(&wb->b_dirty)) { struct inode *tail; @@ -1184,6 +1189,13 @@ static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb) inode_io_list_move_locked(inode, wb, &wb->b_dirty); } +static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb) +{ + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); + redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb); + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); +} + /* * requeue inode for re-scanning after bdi->b_io list is exhausted. */ @@ -1394,7 +1406,7 @@ static void requeue_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb, * writeback is not making progress due to locked * buffers. Skip this inode for now. */ - redirty_tail(inode, wb); + redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb); return; } @@ -1414,7 +1426,7 @@ static void requeue_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb, * retrying writeback of the dirty page/inode * that cannot be performed immediately. */ - redirty_tail(inode, wb); + redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb); } } else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) { /* @@ -1422,7 +1434,7 @@ static void requeue_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb, * such as delayed allocation during submission or metadata * updates after data IO completion. */ - redirty_tail(inode, wb); + redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb); } else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) { inode->dirtied_when = jiffies; inode_io_list_move_locked(inode, wb, &wb->b_dirty_time); @@ -1669,8 +1681,8 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, */ spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); if (inode->i_state & (I_NEW | I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)) { + redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb); spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); - redirty_tail(inode, wb); continue; } if ((inode->i_state & I_SYNC) && wbc.sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL) { -- 2.16.4