From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,FAKE_REPLY_C, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE34DC433E3 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 13:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B016520578 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 13:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731855AbgGONf7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:35:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43100 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730872AbgGONf7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:35:59 -0400 Received: from nautica.notk.org (ipv6.notk.org [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:7a93::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1666AC061755; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 06:35:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C406EC01B; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:35:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:35:41 +0200 From: Dominique Martinet To: Victor Hsieh , Greg KH Cc: Eric Biggers , v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, Eric Van Hensbergen , Latchesar Ionkov , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/9p: Fix TCREATE's fid in protocol Message-ID: <20200715133541.GA22828@nautica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200715080358.GA2521386@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Victor Hsieh wrote on Tue, Jul 14, 2020: > Please disregard this patch. I misunderstood the protocol and have > found the actual problem in the hypervisor's 9P implementation. Sorry > about the noise. Ok, thanks for the notice. Greg KH wrote on Wed, Jul 15, 2020: > As Eric says, this is fine to cc: stable with this kind of thing. It's > good to get a "heads up" on patches that are coming, and Sasha runs some > tests on them as well to make sure that they really are going to apply > to what trees you think they should apply to. Hmm, I'm really not sure how useful that is for first version of a patch that actually got refused ;) But if you both say it doesn't hurt I won't advise against it anymore, thanks for correcting me. -- Dominique