Re: [PATCH 1/9] fanotify: fix reporting event to sb/mount marks

[Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>]

On Wed 22-07-20 15:58:41, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> When reporting event with parent/name info, we should not skip sb/mount
> marks mask if event has FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD in the mask.
> 
> This check is a leftover from the time when the event on child was
> reported in a separate callback than the event on parent and we did
> not want to get duplicate events for sb/mount mark.
> 
> Fixes: eca4784cbb18 ("fsnotify: send event to parent and child with single callback")
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>

OK, I've decided to just drop "fanotify: report both events on parent and
child with single callback" because it didn't improve anything and amend
eca4784cbb18 with this change...

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 8 +++-----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> index a24f08a9c50f..36ea0cd6387e 100644
> --- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> @@ -265,13 +265,11 @@ static u32 fanotify_group_event_mask(struct fsnotify_group *group,
>  			continue;
>  
>  		/*
> -		 * If the event is for a child and this mark doesn't care about
> -		 * events on a child, don't send it!
> -		 * The special object type "child" always cares about events on
> -		 * a child, because it refers to the child inode itself.
> +		 * If the event is for a child and this mark is on a parent not
> +		 * watching children, don't send it!
>  		 */
>  		if (event_mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD &&
> -		    type != FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_CHILD &&
> +		    type == FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_INODE &&
>  		    !(mark->mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD))
>  			continue;
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR