From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B1DC433E0 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:03:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01652075B for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:03:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1596376986; bh=MfDHqqMit+hSKntxVK7N8UOl+i+Xf4TOcn3dkPfEHKU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=QONxowzhFs2tZo5R+Lmd+cQ61keX56rY8cHUWQvJtav1LBBXJ/60grmjSPQTrpCh+ i3hPQAWOjlGF1GiGwDXKjMR9eXphgVssxKa4F/8jDKG2swpdFUVJ4I8nZVrbV0kdUn 5oJPfxtw+000IKERiuG24ru1WybEYGNvVxgSh3LA= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725881AbgHBODC (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Aug 2020 10:03:02 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33006 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725290AbgHBODC (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Aug 2020 10:03:02 -0400 Received: from localhost (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C47E206DA; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:03:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1596376981; bh=MfDHqqMit+hSKntxVK7N8UOl+i+Xf4TOcn3dkPfEHKU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=KCCoZzei4YlvGLCmLc3F1NM+BrofKE3kQF8HLCrDkY2lDxQxTw63qkeOGAHmCRD76 GVUrM5QtLJnVKiPvc7hYGcIT3AdB0B0ALUf7lporEw3MmHSSbo4UmpFVUge1Ch2cLu O6MjbhBEky6VmkG385W9qB/PYFp2LofpLD5oHFF0= Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 10:03:00 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: Pavel Machek Cc: Deven Bowers , agk@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, snitzer@redhat.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, paul@paul-moore.com, eparis@redhat.com, jannh@google.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com, tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, jaskarankhurana@linux.microsoft.com, mdsakib@microsoft.com, nramas@linux.microsoft.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/11] Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM (IPE) Message-ID: <20200802140300.GA2975990@sasha-vm> References: <20200728213614.586312-1-deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com> <20200802115545.GA1162@bug> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200802115545.GA1162@bug> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 01:55:45PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: >Hi! > >> IPE is a Linux Security Module which allows for a configurable >> policy to enforce integrity requirements on the whole system. It >> attempts to solve the issue of Code Integrity: that any code being >> executed (or files being read), are identical to the version that >> was built by a trusted source. > >How is that different from security/integrity/ima? Maybe if you would have read the cover letter all the way down to the 5th paragraph which explains how IPE is different from IMA we could avoided this mail exchange... -- Thanks, Sasha