linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] quota: widen timestamps for the fs_disk_quota structure
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 08:01:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200907150104.GF7955@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200907100218.GA18556@quack2.suse.cz>

On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 12:02:18PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sat 05-09-20 09:47:03, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > 
> > Soon, XFS will support quota grace period expiration timestamps beyond
> > the year 2038, widen the timestamp fields to handle the extra time bits.
> > Internally, XFS now stores unsigned 34-bit quantities, so the extra 8
> > bits here should work fine.  (Note that XFS is the only user of this
> > structure.)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> 
> Looks good to me. Just one question below:
> 
> > diff --git a/fs/quota/quota.c b/fs/quota/quota.c
> > index 5444d3c4d93f..eefac57c52fd 100644
> > --- a/fs/quota/quota.c
> > +++ b/fs/quota/quota.c
> > @@ -481,6 +481,14 @@ static inline u64 quota_btobb(u64 bytes)
> >  	return (bytes + (1 << XFS_BB_SHIFT) - 1) >> XFS_BB_SHIFT;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline s64 copy_from_xfs_dqblk_ts(const struct fs_disk_quota *d,
> > +		__s32 timer, __s8 timer_hi)
> > +{
> > +	if (d->d_fieldmask & FS_DQ_BIGTIME)
> > +		return (u32)timer | (s64)timer_hi << 32;
> > +	return timer;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> So this doesn't do any checks that the resulting time fits into 34-bits you
> speak about in the changelog. So how will XFS react if malicious / buggy
> userspace will pass too big timestamp? I suppose xfs_fs_set_dqblk() should
> return EFBIG or EINVAL or something like that which I'm not sure it does...
> 
> For record I've checked VFS quota implementation and it doesn't need any
> checks because VFS in memory structures and on-disk format use 64-bit
> timestamps. The ancient quota format uses 32-bit timestamps for 32-bit
> archs so these would get silently truncated when stored on disk but
> honestly I don't think I care (that format was deprecated some 20 years
> ago).

XFS will clamp any out-of-bounds value to the nearest representable
number.  For example, if you tried to extend a quota's grace expiration
to the year 2600, it set the expiration to 2486, similar to what the vfs
does for timestamps now.  If you try to set the default grace period to,
say, 100 years, it will clamp that to 68 years (2^31-1).

(I doubt anyone cares to set a 60+ year grace period, but as some
apparently immortal person claims to be playing a 600-year musical
score[1] perhaps we will need to revisit that...)

--D

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/As_Slow_as_Possible

> 
> 								Honza
> -- 
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
> SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-07 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-05 16:47 [PATCH v2] quota: widen timestamps for the fs_disk_quota structure Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-05 16:50 ` [PATCH] quotatools: support grace period expirations past y2038 in userspace Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-07 10:22   ` Jan Kara
2020-09-05 22:02 ` [PATCH v2] quota: widen timestamps for the fs_disk_quota structure Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-06 17:09   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-07 10:02 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-07 15:01   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-09-07 16:28     ` Jan Kara
2020-09-08 14:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-09  1:33 ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200907150104.GF7955@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).