From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Hao Li <lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
david@fromorbit.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
y-goto@fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: Handle I_DONTCACHE in iput_final() instead of generic_drop_inode()
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 16:03:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200908230331.GF1930795@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200904075939.176366-1-lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 03:59:39PM +0800, Hao Li wrote:
> If generic_drop_inode() returns true, it means iput_final() can evict
> this inode regardless of whether it is dirty or not. If we check
> I_DONTCACHE in generic_drop_inode(), any inode with this bit set will be
> evicted unconditionally. This is not the desired behavior because
> I_DONTCACHE only means the inode shouldn't be cached on the LRU list.
> As for whether we need to evict this inode, this is what
> generic_drop_inode() should do. This patch corrects the usage of
> I_DONTCACHE.
>
> This patch was proposed in [1].
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20200831003407.GE12096@dread.disaster.area/
>
> Fixes: dae2f8ed7992 ("fs: Lift XFS_IDONTCACHE to the VFS layer")
> Signed-off-by: Hao Li <lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Adjust code format
> - Add Fixes tag in commit message
>
> fs/inode.c | 4 +++-
> include/linux/fs.h | 3 +--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> index 72c4c347afb7..19ad823f781c 100644
> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -1625,7 +1625,9 @@ static void iput_final(struct inode *inode)
> else
> drop = generic_drop_inode(inode);
>
> - if (!drop && (sb->s_flags & SB_ACTIVE)) {
> + if (!drop &&
> + !(inode->i_state & I_DONTCACHE) &&
> + (sb->s_flags & SB_ACTIVE)) {
> inode_add_lru(inode);
> spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> return;
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index e019ea2f1347..93caee80ce47 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -2922,8 +2922,7 @@ extern int inode_needs_sync(struct inode *inode);
> extern int generic_delete_inode(struct inode *inode);
> static inline int generic_drop_inode(struct inode *inode)
> {
> - return !inode->i_nlink || inode_unhashed(inode) ||
> - (inode->i_state & I_DONTCACHE);
> + return !inode->i_nlink || inode_unhashed(inode);
> }
> extern void d_mark_dontcache(struct inode *inode);
>
> --
> 2.28.0
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-08 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-04 7:59 [PATCH v2] fs: Handle I_DONTCACHE in iput_final() instead of generic_drop_inode() Hao Li
2020-09-06 21:40 ` Dave Chinner
2020-09-22 2:19 ` Hao Li
2020-09-08 23:03 ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2020-10-23 7:49 ` Li, Hao
2020-11-05 10:55 ` Li, Hao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200908230331.GF1930795@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com \
--to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=y-goto@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).