linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V3 9/9] x86/pks: Add PKS test code
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 21:46:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201015044632.GT2046448@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f9ebe3b-5c1c-6a69-3779-6f90d66227bd@intel.com>

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 12:02:07PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 10/9/20 12:42 PM, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> >  	/*
> >  	 * We can fault-in kernel-space virtual memory on-demand. The
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pkeys.h b/include/linux/pkeys.h
> > index cc3510cde64e..f9552bd9341f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pkeys.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pkeys.h
> > @@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ static inline bool arch_pkeys_enabled(void)
> >  static inline void copy_init_pkru_to_fpregs(void)
> >  {
> >  }
> > -
> >  #endif /* ! CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PKEYS */
> 
> ^ Whitespace damage

Done.

> 
> >  #ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SUPERVISOR_PKEYS
> > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > index 0c781f912f9f..f015c09ba5a1 100644
> > --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > @@ -2400,6 +2400,18 @@ config HYPERV_TESTING
> >  	help
> >  	  Select this option to enable Hyper-V vmbus testing.
> >  
> > +config PKS_TESTING
> > +	bool "PKey(S)upervisor testing"
> 
> Seems like we need a space in there somewhere.

heheh...  yea...

> 
> > +	pid = fork();
> > +	if (pid == 0) {
> > +		fd = open("/sys/kernel/debug/x86/run_pks", O_RDWR);
> > +		if (fd < 0) {
> > +			printf("cannot open file\n");
> > +			return -1;
> > +		}
> > +
> 
> Will this return code make anybody mad?  Should we have a nicer return
> code for when this is running on non-PKS hardware?

I'm not sure it will matter much but I think it is better to report the missing
file.[1]

> 
> I'm not going to be too picky about this.  I'll just ask one question:
> Has this found real bugs for you?

Many, especially regressions as things have changed.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> 

Thanks,
Ira

[1]

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_pks.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_pks.c
index 8037a2a9ff5f..11be4e212d54 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_pks.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_pks.c
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
 #include <sys/stat.h>
 #include <fcntl.h>
 
+#define PKS_TEST_FILE "/sys/kernel/debug/x86/run_pks"
+
 int main(void)
 {
        cpu_set_t cpuset;
@@ -25,9 +27,9 @@ int main(void)
 
        pid = fork();
        if (pid == 0) {
-               fd = open("/sys/kernel/debug/x86/run_pks", O_RDWR);
+               fd = open(PKS_TEST_FILE, O_RDWR);
                if (fd < 0) {
-                       printf("cannot open file\n");
+                       printf("cannot open %s\n", PKS_TEST_FILE);
                        return -1;
                }
 
@@ -45,9 +47,9 @@ int main(void)
        } else {
                sleep(2);
 
-               fd = open("/sys/kernel/debug/x86/run_pks", O_RDWR);
+               fd = open(PKS_TEST_FILE, O_RDWR);
                if (fd < 0) {
-                       printf("cannot open file\n");
+                       printf("cannot open %s\n", PKS_TEST_FILE);
                        return -1;
                }
 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-15  4:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-09 19:42 [PATCH RFC V3 0/9] PKS: Add Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) support RFC v3 ira.weiny
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 1/9] x86/pkeys: Create pkeys_common.h ira.weiny
2020-10-13 17:46   ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-13 19:44     ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 2/9] x86/fpu: Refactor arch_set_user_pkey_access() for PKS support ira.weiny
2020-10-13 17:50   ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-13 23:56     ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-16 10:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-17  3:32     ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-19  9:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 3/9] x86/pks: Enable Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) ira.weiny
2020-10-13 18:23   ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-14  2:08     ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 4/9] x86/pks: Preserve the PKRS MSR on context switch ira.weiny
2020-10-13 18:31   ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-14 22:36     ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-16 11:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-17  5:14       ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-19  9:37         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-19 18:48           ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-16 11:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-17  5:37     ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 5/9] x86/pks: Add PKS kernel API ira.weiny
2020-10-13 18:43   ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-15  1:08     ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-16 11:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-17  5:42     ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 6/9] x86/entry: Pass irqentry_state_t by reference ira.weiny
2020-10-16 11:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-16 12:55     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-19  5:37       ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-19  9:32         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-19 20:26           ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-19 21:12             ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-20 14:10               ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 7/9] x86/entry: Preserve PKRS MSR across exceptions ira.weiny
2020-10-13 18:52   ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-15  3:46     ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-15  4:06       ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-15  4:18         ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 8/9] x86/fault: Report the PKRS state on fault ira.weiny
2020-10-13 18:56   ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-15  4:13     ` Ira Weiny
2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 9/9] x86/pks: Add PKS test code ira.weiny
2020-10-13 19:02   ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-15  4:46     ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2020-10-09 20:18 ` [PATCH RFC V3 0/9] PKS: Add Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) support RFC v3 Ira Weiny

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201015044632.GT2046448@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com \
    --to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).