linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@mykernel.net>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, miklos <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	amir73il <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	linux-unionfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	charliecgxu <charliecgxu@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] ovl: mark overlayfs' inode dirty on shared writable mmap
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:03:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201105140332.GG32718@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <175931b5387.1349cecf47061.3904278910555065520@mykernel.net>

On Wed 04-11-20 19:54:03, Chengguang Xu wrote:
>  ---- 在 星期二, 2020-11-03 01:30:52 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 撰写 ----
>  > On Sun 25-10-20 11:41:14, Chengguang Xu wrote:
>  > > Overlayfs cannot be notified when mmapped area gets dirty,
>  > > so we need to proactively mark inode dirty in ->mmap operation.
>  > > 
>  > > Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@mykernel.net>
>  > > ---
>  > >  fs/overlayfs/file.c | 4 ++++
>  > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>  > > 
>  > > diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/file.c b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
>  > > index efccb7c1f9bc..cd6fcdfd81a9 100644
>  > > --- a/fs/overlayfs/file.c
>  > > +++ b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
>  > > @@ -486,6 +486,10 @@ static int ovl_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  > >          /* Drop reference count from new vm_file value */
>  > >          fput(realfile);
>  > >      } else {
>  > > +        if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_SHARED|VM_MAYSHARE) &&
>  > > +            vma->vm_flags & (VM_WRITE|VM_MAYWRITE))
>  > > +            ovl_mark_inode_dirty(file_inode(file));
>  > > +
>  > 
>  > But does this work reliably? I mean once writeback runs, your inode (as
>  > well as upper inode) is cleaned. Then a page fault comes so file has dirty
>  > pages again and would need flushing but overlayfs inode stays clean? Am I
>  > missing something?
>  > 
> 
> Yeah, this is key point of this approach, in order to  fix the issue I
> explicitly set I_DIRTY_SYNC flag in ovl_mark_inode_dirty(), so what i
> mean is during writeback we will call into ->write_inode() by this
> flag(I_DIRTY_SYNC) and at that place we get chance to check mapping and
> re-dirty overlay's inode. The code logic like below in ovl_write_inode().
> 
>     if (mapping_writably_mapped(upper->i_mapping) ||
>          mapping_tagged(upper->i_mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK))
>                  iflag |= I_DIRTY_PAGES; 

OK, but suppose the upper mapping is clean at this moment (upper inode has
been fully written out for whatever reason, but it is still mapped) so your
overlayfs inode becomes clean as well. Then I don't see a mechanism which
would make your overlayfs inode dirty again when a write to mmap happens,
set_page_dirty() will end up marking upper inode with I_DIRTY_PAGES flag.

Note that ovl_mmap() gets called only at mmap(2) syscall time but then
pages get faulted in, dirtied, cleaned fully at discretion of the mm
/ writeback subsystem.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-05 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-25  3:41 [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] implement containerized syncfs for overlayfs Chengguang Xu
2020-10-25  3:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] ovl: setup overlayfs' private bdi Chengguang Xu
2020-10-25  3:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] ovl: implement ->writepages operation Chengguang Xu
2020-11-02 17:17   ` Jan Kara
2020-11-04 12:18     ` Chengguang Xu
2020-11-05 13:55       ` Jan Kara
2020-11-06  5:57         ` Chengguang Xu
2020-10-25  3:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] ovl: implement overlayfs' ->evict_inode operation Chengguang Xu
2020-10-25  3:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] ovl: mark overlayfs' inode dirty on modification Chengguang Xu
2020-10-25  3:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] ovl: mark overlayfs' inode dirty on shared writable mmap Chengguang Xu
2020-11-02 17:30   ` Jan Kara
2020-11-04 11:54     ` Chengguang Xu
2020-11-05 14:03       ` Jan Kara [this message]
2020-11-05 14:21         ` Amir Goldstein
2020-11-05 15:54           ` Jan Kara
2020-11-06  2:41             ` Chengguang Xu
2020-11-06  8:50               ` Jan Kara
2020-11-06  9:47                 ` Chengguang Xu
2020-10-25  3:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] ovl: implement overlayfs' ->write_inode operation Chengguang Xu
2020-10-25  3:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] ovl: cache dirty overlayfs' inode Chengguang Xu
2020-10-25  3:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] ovl: implement containerized syncfs for overlayfs Chengguang Xu
2020-10-30 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] " Miklos Szeredi
2020-10-31 12:22   ` Chengguang Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201105140332.GG32718@quack2.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgxu519@mykernel.net \
    --cc=charliecgxu@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).