From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA5DC5519F for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6FE2223D for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726536AbgKRHJ5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 02:09:57 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:34250 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726506AbgKRHJ5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 02:09:57 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 9279967373; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:09:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:09:54 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jens Axboe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "Darrick J. Wong" , linux-fsdevel Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] iomap: only return IO error if no data has been transferred Message-ID: <20201118070954.GA17326@lst.de> References: <2a56ae95-b64e-f20f-8875-62a2f2e8e00f@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2a56ae95-b64e-f20f-8875-62a2f2e8e00f@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 03:17:18PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > If we've successfully transferred some data in __iomap_dio_rw(), > don't mark an error for a latter segment in the dio. For normal direct I/O we never return short reads/writes, and IIRC that has been inherited from the old direct I/O code. I think we'll need to make this conditional on your nowait case rather than changing the user visible behavior.