linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eventfd: convert to ->write_iter()
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:18:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201118151806.GA25804@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a4f07e6ec47b681a32c6df5d463857e67bfc965.1605690824.git.mkubecek@suse.cz>

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:19:17AM +0100, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> While eventfd ->read() callback was replaced by ->read_iter() recently,
> it still provides ->write() for writes. Since commit 4d03e3cc5982 ("fs:
> don't allow kernel reads and writes without iter ops"), this prevents
> kernel_write() to be used for eventfd and with set_fs() removal,
> ->write() cannot be easily called directly with a kernel buffer.
> 
> According to eventfd(2), eventfd descriptors are supposed to be (also)
> used by kernel to notify userspace applications of events which now
> requires ->write_iter() op to be available (and ->write() not to be).
> Therefore convert eventfd_write() to ->write_iter() semantics. This
> patch also cleans up the code in a similar way as commit 12aceb89b0bc
> ("eventfd: convert to f_op->read_iter()") did in read_iter().

A far as I can tell we don't have an in-tree user that writes to an
eventfd.  We can merge something like this once there is a user.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-18 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-18  9:19 [PATCH] eventfd: convert to ->write_iter() Michal Kubecek
2020-11-18 15:18 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-11-18 19:59   ` Michal Kubecek
2020-11-18 21:27     ` Jens Axboe
2020-11-18 23:18       ` Michal Kubecek
2020-11-18 23:25         ` Jens Axboe
2020-11-18 23:34           ` Michal Kubecek
2020-11-22 14:42 ` [eventfd] 5cb13cb023: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -6.3% regression kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201118151806.GA25804@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).