linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>
Cc: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, miklos@szeredi.hu,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>,
	Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] overlay: Add rudimentary checking of writeback errseq on volatile remount
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:15:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130191509.GC14328@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201127092058.15117-5-sargun@sargun.me>

On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 01:20:58AM -0800, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> Volatile remounts validate the following at the moment:
>  * Has the module been reloaded / the system rebooted
>  * Has the workdir been remounted
> 
> This adds a new check for errors detected via the superblock's
> errseq_t. At mount time, the errseq_t is snapshotted to disk,
> and upon remount it's re-verified. This allows for kernel-level
> detection of errors without forcing userspace to perform a
> sync and allows for the hidden detection of writeback errors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
> Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h | 1 +
>  fs/overlayfs/readdir.c   | 6 ++++++
>  fs/overlayfs/super.c     | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h b/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h
> index de694ee99d7c..e8a711953b64 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct ovl_volatile_info {
>  	 */
>  	uuid_t		ovl_boot_id;	/* Must stay first member */
>  	u64		s_instance_id;
> +	errseq_t	errseq;	/* Implemented as a u32 */
>  } __packed;
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/readdir.c b/fs/overlayfs/readdir.c
> index 7b66fbb20261..5795b28bb4cf 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/readdir.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/readdir.c
> @@ -1117,6 +1117,12 @@ static int ovl_verify_volatile_info(struct ovl_fs *ofs,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	err = errseq_check(&volatiledir->d_sb->s_wb_err, info.errseq);
> +	if (err) {
> +		pr_debug("Workdir filesystem reports errors: %d\n", err);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> index a8ee3ba4ebbd..2e473f8c75dd 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> @@ -1248,6 +1248,7 @@ static int ovl_set_volatile_info(struct ovl_fs *ofs, struct dentry *volatiledir)
>  	int err;
>  	struct ovl_volatile_info info = {
>  		.s_instance_id = volatiledir->d_sb->s_instance_id,
> +		.errseq = errseq_sample(&volatiledir->d_sb->s_wb_err),

errse_sample() seems to return 0 if nobody has seen the error yet. That
means on remount we will fail. It is a false failure from our perspective
and we are not interested in knowing if somebody else has seen the
failure or not. 

Maybe we need a flag in errseq_sample() to get us current value
irrespective of the fact whether anybody has seen the error or not?

If we end up making this change, then we probably will have to somehow
mask ERRSEQ_SEEN bit in errseq_check() comparison. Because if we
sampled ->s_wb_err when nobody saw it and later by the remount time
say ERRSEQ_SEEN is set, we don't want remount to fail.

Thanks
Vivek
>  	};
>  
>  	uuid_copy(&info.ovl_boot_id, &ovl_boot_id);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-30 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-27  9:20 [PATCH v2 0/4] Make overlayfs volatile mounts reusable Sargun Dhillon
2020-11-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] fs: Add s_instance_id field to superblock for unique identification Sargun Dhillon
2020-11-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] overlay: Document current outstanding shortcoming of volatile Sargun Dhillon
2020-11-27 12:52   ` Amir Goldstein
2020-11-27 22:11     ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-11-28  2:01       ` Jeff Layton
2020-11-28  4:45         ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-11-28  7:12           ` Amir Goldstein
2020-11-28  8:52             ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-11-28  9:04               ` Amir Goldstein
2020-12-01 11:09               ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-12-01 11:29                 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-12-01 13:01                 ` Jeff Layton
2020-12-01 15:24                   ` Vivek Goyal
2020-12-01 16:10                     ` Jeff Layton
2020-11-28 12:04           ` Jeff Layton
2020-11-28  8:56       ` Amir Goldstein
2020-11-28  9:06         ` Amir Goldstein
2020-11-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] overlay: Add the ability to remount volatile directories when safe Sargun Dhillon
2020-11-27 11:09   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-27 13:04   ` Amir Goldstein
2020-12-07 11:39   ` Dan Carpenter
2020-11-27  9:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] overlay: Add rudimentary checking of writeback errseq on volatile remount Sargun Dhillon
2020-11-30 18:43   ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-30 19:15   ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2020-12-05  9:13     ` Amir Goldstein
2020-12-05 13:51       ` Jeff Layton
2020-12-05 14:51         ` Amir Goldstein
2020-11-30 19:33   ` Vivek Goyal
2020-12-01 11:56     ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-12-01 12:45       ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201130191509.GC14328@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwalsh@redhat.com \
    --cc=gscrivan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=sargun@sargun.me \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).