linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Li <lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <ira.weiny@intel.com>, <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] fs: Handle I_DONTCACHE in iput_final() instead of generic_drop_inode()
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:08:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201208020843.3784-1-lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)

If generic_drop_inode() returns true, it means iput_final() can evict
this inode regardless of whether it is dirty or not. If we check
I_DONTCACHE in generic_drop_inode(), any inode with this bit set will be
evicted unconditionally. This is not the desired behavior because
I_DONTCACHE only means the inode shouldn't be cached on the LRU list.
As for whether we need to evict this inode, this is what
generic_drop_inode() should do. This patch corrects the usage of
I_DONTCACHE.

This patch was proposed in [1].

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20200831003407.GE12096@dread.disaster.area/

Fixes: dae2f8ed7992 ("fs: Lift XFS_IDONTCACHE to the VFS layer")
Signed-off-by: Hao Li <lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
---
This patch may have been forgotten.
Original patch: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20200904075939.176366-1-lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com/

 fs/inode.c         | 4 +++-
 include/linux/fs.h | 3 +--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 9d78c37b00b8..5eea9912a0b9 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -1627,7 +1627,9 @@ static void iput_final(struct inode *inode)
 	else
 		drop = generic_drop_inode(inode);
 
-	if (!drop && (sb->s_flags & SB_ACTIVE)) {
+	if (!drop &&
+	    !(inode->i_state & I_DONTCACHE) &&
+	    (sb->s_flags & SB_ACTIVE)) {
 		inode_add_lru(inode);
 		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 		return;
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 8667d0cdc71e..8bde32cf9711 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2878,8 +2878,7 @@ extern int inode_needs_sync(struct inode *inode);
 extern int generic_delete_inode(struct inode *inode);
 static inline int generic_drop_inode(struct inode *inode)
 {
-	return !inode->i_nlink || inode_unhashed(inode) ||
-		(inode->i_state & I_DONTCACHE);
+	return !inode->i_nlink || inode_unhashed(inode);
 }
 extern void d_mark_dontcache(struct inode *inode);
 
-- 
2.28.0




             reply	other threads:[~2020-12-08  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-08  2:08 Hao Li [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-11-10  2:56 [PATCH] fs: Handle I_DONTCACHE in iput_final() instead of generic_drop_inode() Hao Li
2020-08-31 10:13 Hao Li
2020-08-31 17:12 ` Ira Weiny
2020-09-01  3:48   ` Li, Hao
2020-09-03 21:58 ` Dave Chinner
2020-09-04  7:07   ` Li, Hao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201208020843.3784-1-lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=lihao2018.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).