From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org,
yzaikin@google.com, adobriyan@gmail.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
wangle6@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] proc_sysctl: fix oops caused by incorrect command parameters.
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:50:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202101111149.20A58E1@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210111142131.GA22493@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 03:21:31PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 11-01-21 11:48:19, Xiaoming Ni wrote:
> [...]
> > patch3:
> > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
> > @@ -1770,6 +1770,9 @@ static int process_sysctl_arg(char *param, char *val,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > + if (!val)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > /*
> > * To set sysctl options, we use a temporary mount of proc, look up the
> > * respective sys/ file and write to it. To avoid mounting it when no
> >
> > sysctl log for patch3:
> > Setting sysctl args: `' invalid for parameter `hung_task_panic'
> [...]
> > When process_sysctl_arg() is called, the param parameter may not be the
> > sysctl parameter.
> >
> > Patch3 or patch4, which is better?
>
> Patch3
Oh, I see the issue here -- I thought we were only calling
process_sysctl_arg() with valid sysctl fields. It looks like we're not,
which means it should silently ignore everything that isn't a sysctl
field, and only return -EINVAL when it IS a sysctl but it lacks a value.
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-11 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-08 2:33 [PATCH v2] proc_sysctl: fix oops caused by incorrect command parameters Xiaoming Ni
2021-01-08 9:21 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-08 10:01 ` Xiaoming Ni
2021-01-08 11:47 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-08 19:56 ` Kees Cook
2021-01-08 20:10 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-09 1:50 ` Andrew Morton
2021-01-11 3:48 ` Xiaoming Ni
2021-01-11 14:21 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-11 19:50 ` Kees Cook [this message]
[not found] ` <CAHp75Vfdyh1ad7p_-uqYZPyF78tOB96HKNQVXkOv_yrReo2Mcg@mail.gmail.com>
2021-01-11 3:14 ` Xiaoming Ni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202101111149.20A58E1@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nixiaoming@huawei.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wangle6@huawei.com \
--cc=yzaikin@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).