From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA06C433DB for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E327923A51 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387690AbhAUQ7G (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:59:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41738 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387566AbhAUPts (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 10:49:48 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BABE8C06174A; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 07:49:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=ZL81M5BEqTudNah5tQWg3R+0k1d+KEs2wiEIXk0AHyU=; b=e3+fCJZ4+c/Bd3YFXUnB7wc2QG zNZApZUXVsJIXgnQ3uDIrk+MdHuBf/EAIQAJSnrt6uQWYQQLnG987ACUBhaoUtT4BMyP/mF3Vnu+o Sn3t0XGgrj/oantRFYObogGn5kFFTLcFx66G5HjEw0Q1G4zvbIqlp5lU8wjt+2Ih1jIWXudnMZVIE EdVihksh4xOV1tWg+RnHNpWlmqeYz41Fcqlop7WHGueLMzdxE08vtnXSgAf24+aIk1aE13JpWuHx0 nQebCiUviossBNnJbDfhqJ/XS9RyRy4zHsANcSszrwiWOxpBQJ//Ou5+u8CsNXSVlCCBxAOkNBPY5 5my++V+w==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l2cBU-00HDop-6A; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:47:51 +0000 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:47:44 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Mikulas Patocka Cc: Jan Kara , Dave Chinner , Zhongwei Cai , Theodore Ts'o , David Laight , Mingkai Dong , Andrew Morton , Steven Whitehouse , Eric Sandeen , Dave Chinner , Wang Jianchao , Rajesh Tadakamadla , linux-kernel , linux-fsdevel , linux-nvdimm Subject: Re: Expense of read_iter Message-ID: <20210121154744.GQ2260413@casper.infradead.org> References: <20210107151125.GB5270@casper.infradead.org> <17045315-CC1F-4165-B8E3-BA55DD16D46B@gmail.com> <2041983017.5681521.1610459100858.JavaMail.zimbra@sjtu.edu.cn> <1224425872.715547.1610703643424.JavaMail.zimbra@sjtu.edu.cn> <20210120044700.GA4626@dread.disaster.area> <20210120141834.GA24063@quack2.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:12:01AM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > Do you have some idea how to optimize the generic code that calls > ->read_iter? Yes. > It might be better to maintain an f_iocb_flags in the > struct file and just copy that unconditionally. We'd need to remember > to update it in fcntl(F_SETFL), but I think that's the only place. Want to give that a try?