linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <schumakeranna@gmail.com>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nfsd: move change attribute generation to filesystem
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 08:20:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210122082059.GA119852@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210121202756.GA13298@pick.fieldses.org>

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 03:27:56PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > Another indirect call just to fetch the change attribute (which happens
> > a lot IIRC) does not seem very optimal to me.
> 
> In the next patch we're removing an fh_getattr (vfs_getattr) in the case
> we call the new op, so that's typically a net decrease in indirect
> calls.
> 
> Though maybe we could use a flag here and do without either.
> 
> > And the fact that we need three duplicate implementations also is not
> > very nice.
> 
> Ext4 and xfs are identical, btrfs is a little different since it doesn't
> consult I_VERSION.  (And then there's nfs, which uses the origin
> server's i_version if it can.)

I'd much prefer to just keep consulting the I_VERSION flag and only
add the new op as an override for the NFS export.

> 
> I also have a vague idea that some filesystem-specific improvements
> might be possible.  (E.g., if a filesystem had some kind of boot count
> in the superblock, maybe that would be a better way to prevent the
> change attribute from going backwards on reboot than the thing
> generic_fetch_iversion is currently doing with ctime.  But I have no
> concrete plan there, maybe I'm dreaming.)

Even without the ctime i_version never goes backward, what is the
problem here?

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-22  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-19 19:24 [PATCH 0/3] NFS change attribute patches J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-19 19:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] nfs: use change attribute for NFS re-exports J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-19 19:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] nfsd: move change attribute generation to filesystem J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-20  8:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-21 20:27     ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-22  8:20       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-01-22 14:47         ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-22 17:32           ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-22 18:46             ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-29 19:25         ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-29 19:26         ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] nfs: use change attribute for NFS re-exports J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-29 19:27           ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] nfsd: skip some unnecessary stats in the v4 case J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-30  6:02             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-29 20:43           ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] nfs: use change attribute for NFS re-exports Chuck Lever
2021-01-30  6:02           ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-19 19:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] nfsd: skip some unnecessary stats in the v4 case J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-22 17:34 ` [PATCH 0/3] NFS change attribute patches Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210122082059.GA119852@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=bfields@redhat.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schumakeranna@gmail.com \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).