linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To: willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
	shakeelb@google.com, guro@fb.com, shy828301@gmail.com,
	alexs@kernel.org, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, david@fromorbit.com,
	trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com, anna.schumaker@netapp.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
	fam.zheng@bytedance.com, Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/17] xarray: replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_alloc_lru
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 18:46:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210511104647.604-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210511104647.604-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>

The workingset will add the xa_node to the shadow_nodes list. So the
allocation of xa_node should be done by kmem_cache_alloc_lru(). The
user of the xarray can xas_set_lru() to pass the list_lru.

Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
---
 include/linux/xarray.h |  9 ++++++++-
 lib/xarray.c           | 10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/xarray.h b/include/linux/xarray.h
index a91e3d90df8a..31f3e5ef3c7b 100644
--- a/include/linux/xarray.h
+++ b/include/linux/xarray.h
@@ -1317,6 +1317,7 @@ struct xa_state {
 	struct xa_node *xa_node;
 	struct xa_node *xa_alloc;
 	xa_update_node_t xa_update;
+	struct list_lru *xa_lru;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -1336,7 +1337,8 @@ struct xa_state {
 	.xa_pad = 0,					\
 	.xa_node = XAS_RESTART,				\
 	.xa_alloc = NULL,				\
-	.xa_update = NULL				\
+	.xa_update = NULL,				\
+	.xa_lru = NULL,					\
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1613,6 +1615,11 @@ static inline void xas_set_update(struct xa_state *xas, xa_update_node_t update)
 	xas->xa_update = update;
 }
 
+static inline void xas_set_lru(struct xa_state *xas, struct list_lru *lru)
+{
+	xas->xa_lru = lru;
+}
+
 /**
  * xas_next_entry() - Advance iterator to next present entry.
  * @xas: XArray operation state.
diff --git a/lib/xarray.c b/lib/xarray.c
index f5d8f54907b4..e9b818abc823 100644
--- a/lib/xarray.c
+++ b/lib/xarray.c
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ bool xas_nomem(struct xa_state *xas, gfp_t gfp)
 	}
 	if (xas->xa->xa_flags & XA_FLAGS_ACCOUNT)
 		gfp |= __GFP_ACCOUNT;
-	xas->xa_alloc = kmem_cache_alloc(radix_tree_node_cachep, gfp);
+	xas->xa_alloc = kmem_cache_alloc_lru(radix_tree_node_cachep, xas->xa_lru, gfp);
 	if (!xas->xa_alloc)
 		return false;
 	xas->xa_alloc->parent = NULL;
@@ -334,10 +334,10 @@ static bool __xas_nomem(struct xa_state *xas, gfp_t gfp)
 		gfp |= __GFP_ACCOUNT;
 	if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp)) {
 		xas_unlock_type(xas, lock_type);
-		xas->xa_alloc = kmem_cache_alloc(radix_tree_node_cachep, gfp);
+		xas->xa_alloc = kmem_cache_alloc_lru(radix_tree_node_cachep, xas->xa_lru, gfp);
 		xas_lock_type(xas, lock_type);
 	} else {
-		xas->xa_alloc = kmem_cache_alloc(radix_tree_node_cachep, gfp);
+		xas->xa_alloc = kmem_cache_alloc_lru(radix_tree_node_cachep, xas->xa_lru, gfp);
 	}
 	if (!xas->xa_alloc)
 		return false;
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ static void *xas_alloc(struct xa_state *xas, unsigned int shift)
 		if (xas->xa->xa_flags & XA_FLAGS_ACCOUNT)
 			gfp |= __GFP_ACCOUNT;
 
-		node = kmem_cache_alloc(radix_tree_node_cachep, gfp);
+		node = kmem_cache_alloc_lru(radix_tree_node_cachep, xas->xa_lru, gfp);
 		if (!node) {
 			xas_set_err(xas, -ENOMEM);
 			return NULL;
@@ -1014,7 +1014,7 @@ void xas_split_alloc(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry, unsigned int order,
 		void *sibling = NULL;
 		struct xa_node *node;
 
-		node = kmem_cache_alloc(radix_tree_node_cachep, gfp);
+		node = kmem_cache_alloc_lru(radix_tree_node_cachep, xas->xa_lru, gfp);
 		if (!node)
 			goto nomem;
 		node->array = xas->xa;
-- 
2.11.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-11 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-11 10:46 [PATCH 00/17] Optimize list lru memory consumption Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 01/17] mm: list_lru: fix list_lru_count_one() return value Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 02/17] mm: memcontrol: remove kmemcg_id reparenting Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 03/17] mm: memcontrol: remove the kmem states Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 04/17] mm: memcontrol: move memcg_online_kmem() to mem_cgroup_css_online() Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 05/17] mm: list_lru: remove holding lru node lock Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 06/17] mm: list_lru: only add the memcg aware lrus to the list Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 07/17] mm: list_lru: optimize the array of per memcg lists Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 08/17] mm: list_lru: remove memcg_aware from struct list_lru Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 09/17] mm: introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 10/17] fs: introduce alloc_inode_sb() to allocate filesystems specific inode Muchun Song
2021-05-11 23:40   ` Dave Chinner
2021-05-12  3:20     ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 11/17] mm: dcache: use kmem_cache_alloc_lru() to allocate dentry Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 13/17] mm: workingset: allocate list_lru on xa_node allocation Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 14/17] nfs42: use a specific kmem_cache to allocate nfs4_xattr_entry Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 15/17] mm: list_lru: allocate list_lru_one only when needed Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 16/17] mm: list_lru: rename memcg_drain_all_list_lrus to memcg_reparent_list_lrus Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 17/17] mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray Muchun Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210511104647.604-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --to=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexs@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=fam.zheng@bytedance.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 12/17] xarray: replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_alloc_lru' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).