From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] virtiofs: Skip submounts in sget_fc()
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 15:36:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210521153614.061b0005@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegvBB-zRuZAM0m7fxMFCfw=CzN3uT3CqoQrRgizaTH4sOw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 21 May 2021 14:37:25 +0200
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 May 2021 at 12:06, Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 21 May 2021 10:50:34 +0200
> > Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 21 May 2021 at 10:39, Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 21 May 2021 10:26:27 +0200
> > > > Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 17:47, Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > All submounts share the same virtio-fs device instance as the root
> > > > > > mount. If the same virtiofs filesystem is mounted again, sget_fc()
> > > > > > is likely to pick up any of these submounts and reuse it instead of
> > > > > > the root mount.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On the server side:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > # mkdir ${some_dir}
> > > > > > # mkdir ${some_dir}/mnt1
> > > > > > # mount -t tmpfs none ${some_dir}/mnt1
> > > > > > # touch ${some_dir}/mnt1/THIS_IS_MNT1
> > > > > > # mkdir ${some_dir}/mnt2
> > > > > > # mount -t tmpfs none ${some_dir}/mnt2
> > > > > > # touch ${some_dir}/mnt2/THIS_IS_MNT2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On the client side:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > # mkdir /mnt/virtiofs1
> > > > > > # mount -t virtiofs myfs /mnt/virtiofs1
> > > > > > # ls /mnt/virtiofs1
> > > > > > mnt1 mnt2
> > > > > > # grep virtiofs /proc/mounts
> > > > > > myfs /mnt/virtiofs1 virtiofs rw,seclabel,relatime 0 0
> > > > > > none on /mnt/mnt1 type virtiofs (rw,relatime,seclabel)
> > > > > > none on /mnt/mnt2 type virtiofs (rw,relatime,seclabel)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And now remount it again:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > # mount -t virtiofs myfs /mnt/virtiofs2
> > > > > > # grep virtiofs /proc/mounts
> > > > > > myfs /mnt/virtiofs1 virtiofs rw,seclabel,relatime 0 0
> > > > > > none on /mnt/mnt1 type virtiofs (rw,relatime,seclabel)
> > > > > > none on /mnt/mnt2 type virtiofs (rw,relatime,seclabel)
> > > > > > myfs /mnt/virtiofs2 virtiofs rw,seclabel,relatime 0 0
> > > > > > # ls /mnt/virtiofs2
> > > > > > THIS_IS_MNT2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Submount mnt2 was picked-up instead of the root mount.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Why is this a problem?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > It seems very weird to mount the same filesystem again
> > > > and to end up in one of its submounts. We should have:
> > > >
> > > > # ls /mnt/virtiofs2
> > > > mnt1 mnt2
> > >
> > > Okay, sorry, I understand the problem. The solution is wrong,
> > > however: the position of the submount on that list is no indication
> > > that it's the right one (it's possible that the root sb will go away
> > > and only a sub-sb will remain).
> > >
> >
> > Ah... I had myself convinced this could not happen, i.e. you can't
> > unmount a parent sb with a sub-sb still mounted.
>
> No, but it's possible for sub-sb to continue existing after it's no
> longer a submount of original mount.
> >
> > How can this happen ?
>
> E.g. move the submount out of the way, then unmount the parent, or
> detach submount (umount -l) while keeping something open in there and
> umount the parent.
>
Ok, I get it now. Thanks for the clarification.
> > > Even just setting a flag in the root, indicating that it's the root
> > > isn't fully going to solve the problem.
> > >
> > > Here's issue in full:
> > >
> > > case 1: no connection for "myfs" exists
> > > - need to create fuse_conn, sb
> > >
> > > case 2: connection for "myfs" exists but only sb for submount
> >
> > How would we know this sb isn't a root sb ?
> >
> > > - only create sb for root, reuse fuse_conn
> > >
> > > case 3: connection for "myfs" as well as root sb exists
> > > - reuse sb
> > >
> > > I'll think about how to fix this properly, it's probably going to be
> > > rather more involved...
> > >
> >
> > Sure. BTW I'm wondering why we never reuse sbs for submounts ?
>
> Right, same general issue.
>
> An sb can be identified by its root nodeid, so I guess the proper fix
> to make the root nodeid be the key for virtio_fs_test_super().
>
Cool, I was thinking about doing this exactly. :)
> Thanks,
> Miklos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-21 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-20 15:46 [PATCH v4 0/5] virtiofs: propagate sync() to file server Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] fuse: Fix leak in fuse_dentry_automount() error path Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 19:45 ` Al Viro
2021-05-21 7:54 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21 8:15 ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21 8:23 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21 8:08 ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] fuse: Call vfs_get_tree() for submounts Greg Kurz
2021-05-21 8:19 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21 8:28 ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-22 17:50 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-22 20:12 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-20 15:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] fuse: Make fuse_fill_super_submount() static Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] virtiofs: Skip submounts in sget_fc() Greg Kurz
2021-05-21 8:26 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21 8:39 ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21 8:50 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21 10:06 ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21 12:37 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21 13:36 ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2021-05-20 15:46 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] virtiofs: propagate sync() to file server Greg Kurz
2021-05-21 10:08 ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21 12:51 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-08-15 14:14 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-16 15:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-08-16 18:57 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-16 19:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-08-16 19:46 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-28 15:21 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-08-30 17:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-08-30 17:36 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210521153614.061b0005@bahia.lan \
--to=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).