From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F58C4743E for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6A361246 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232732AbhFHM5S (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 08:57:18 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:25513 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232644AbhFHM5R (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 08:57:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1623156924; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=x+SsMma3Ar3rP8pZze2lcFu2xVDJbqONiUJxA3GUBLM=; b=T6yOrHp9bupaim5rcfvPuH0mWy5yozA35WdbHkXPBZtBb7hKkjMcgO058xkpgh/OEvSjtC RQMcOglHnzk9K0YIi4B5sxLL1svjmkk/JX3TkerM/wGtsZOZNaep3baqzrNOpvS2zuVFUF dr1vG2aSBdrr10art5jWnTQFhTNQQMA= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-544-THXSXa15OuConKqzS8b_Kw-1; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 08:55:20 -0400 X-MC-Unique: THXSXa15OuConKqzS8b_Kw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05E07107ACC7; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from madcap2.tricolour.ca (unknown [10.3.128.13]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7DCC5C1D5; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 08:55:05 -0400 From: Richard Guy Briggs To: Paul Moore Cc: Jens Axboe , selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] audit: add filtering for io_uring records, addendum Message-ID: <20210608125504.GA2268484@madcap2.tricolour.ca> References: <3a2903574a4d03f73230047866112b2dad9b4a9e.1622467740.git.rgb@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On 2021-06-07 19:15, Paul Moore wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 9:45 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > The commit ("audit: add filtering for io_uring records") added support for > > filtering io_uring operations. > > > > Add checks to the audit io_uring filtering code for directory and path watches, > > and to keep the list counts consistent. > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs > > --- > > kernel/audit_tree.c | 3 ++- > > kernel/audit_watch.c | 3 ++- > > kernel/auditfilter.c | 7 +++++-- > > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > Thanks for pointing these omissions out in the original patch. When a > patch has obvious problems generally people just provide feedback and > the patch author incorporates the fixes; this helps ensure we don't > merge known broken patches, helping preserve `git bisect`. > > Do you mind if I incorporate these suggestions, and the one in patch > 2/2, into the filtering patch in the original RFC patchset? I'll add > a 'thank you' comment in the commit description as I did to the other > patch where you provided feedback. I feel that is the proper way to > handle this. I should have been more explicit. The intent was to have the fixes incorporated directly into your patches since they aren't committed in any public tree yet, exactly for bisect reasons. I didn't add a "fixes:" tag because it had no public commit hash, but could/should have instead made a note about it or even used the "fixup:" subject tag. Posting using the thread as the "in-reply-to:" for this patchset was the simplest and clearest way to demonstrate the intent and check they were correct and I was too lazy to add a cover letter explaining that. There is also a Co-developed-by: tag that could be used if you feel that is appropriate, now that you mention it, but that appears to imply a much stronger equal contribution. > > diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c > > index 6c91902f4f45..2be285c2f069 100644 > > --- a/kernel/audit_tree.c > > +++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c > > @@ -727,7 +727,8 @@ int audit_make_tree(struct audit_krule *rule, char *pathname, u32 op) > > { > > > > if (pathname[0] != '/' || > > - rule->listnr != AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT || > > + (rule->listnr != AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT && > > + rule->listnr != AUDIT_FILTER_URING_EXIT) || > > op != Audit_equal || > > rule->inode_f || rule->watch || rule->tree) > > return -EINVAL; > > diff --git a/kernel/audit_watch.c b/kernel/audit_watch.c > > index 2acf7ca49154..698b62b4a2ec 100644 > > --- a/kernel/audit_watch.c > > +++ b/kernel/audit_watch.c > > @@ -183,7 +183,8 @@ int audit_to_watch(struct audit_krule *krule, char *path, int len, u32 op) > > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > > if (path[0] != '/' || path[len-1] == '/' || > > - krule->listnr != AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT || > > + (krule->listnr != AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT && > > + krule->listnr != AUDIT_FILTER_URING_EXIT) || > > op != Audit_equal || > > krule->inode_f || krule->watch || krule->tree) > > return -EINVAL; > > diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c > > index c21119c00504..bcdedfd1088c 100644 > > --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c > > +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c > > @@ -153,7 +153,8 @@ char *audit_unpack_string(void **bufp, size_t *remain, size_t len) > > static inline int audit_to_inode(struct audit_krule *krule, > > struct audit_field *f) > > { > > - if (krule->listnr != AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT || > > + if ((krule->listnr != AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT && > > + krule->listnr != AUDIT_FILTER_URING_EXIT) || > > krule->inode_f || krule->watch || krule->tree || > > (f->op != Audit_equal && f->op != Audit_not_equal)) > > return -EINVAL; > > @@ -250,6 +251,7 @@ static inline struct audit_entry *audit_to_entry_common(struct audit_rule_data * > > pr_err("AUDIT_FILTER_ENTRY is deprecated\n"); > > goto exit_err; > > case AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT: > > + case AUDIT_FILTER_URING_EXIT: > > case AUDIT_FILTER_TASK: > > #endif > > case AUDIT_FILTER_USER: > > @@ -982,7 +984,8 @@ static inline int audit_add_rule(struct audit_entry *entry) > > } > > > > entry->rule.prio = ~0ULL; > > - if (entry->rule.listnr == AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT) { > > + if (entry->rule.listnr == AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT || > > + entry->rule.listnr == AUDIT_FILTER_URING_EXIT) { > > if (entry->rule.flags & AUDIT_FILTER_PREPEND) > > entry->rule.prio = ++prio_high; > > else > > paul moore - RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada IRC: rgb, SunRaycer Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635