Re: [PATCH 1/3] fs/fuse: Remove unneeded kaddr parameter

[Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>]

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:24:26AM -0700, 'Ira Weiny' wrote:
> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> 
> fuse_dax_mem_range_init() does not need the address or the pfn of the
> memory requested in dax_direct_access().  It is only calling direct
> access to get the number of pages.

In looking for feedback on this small series I realize that I failed to email
Miklos for the fs/fuse patch.

I'm adding Miklos to the To line...

For the rest of the series is there any feedback?

Ira

> 
> Remove the unused variables and stop requesting the kaddr and pfn from
> dax_direct_access().
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> ---
>  fs/fuse/dax.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dax.c b/fs/fuse/dax.c
> index ff99ab2a3c43..34f8a5635c7f 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/dax.c
> @@ -1234,8 +1234,6 @@ void fuse_dax_conn_free(struct fuse_conn *fc)
>  static int fuse_dax_mem_range_init(struct fuse_conn_dax *fcd)
>  {
>  	long nr_pages, nr_ranges;
> -	void *kaddr;
> -	pfn_t pfn;
>  	struct fuse_dax_mapping *range;
>  	int ret, id;
>  	size_t dax_size = -1;
> @@ -1247,8 +1245,8 @@ static int fuse_dax_mem_range_init(struct fuse_conn_dax *fcd)
>  	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&fcd->free_work, fuse_dax_free_mem_worker);
>  
>  	id = dax_read_lock();
> -	nr_pages = dax_direct_access(fcd->dev, 0, PHYS_PFN(dax_size), &kaddr,
> -				     &pfn);
> +	nr_pages = dax_direct_access(fcd->dev, 0, PHYS_PFN(dax_size), NULL,
> +				     NULL);
>  	dax_read_unlock(id);
>  	if (nr_pages < 0) {
>  		pr_debug("dax_direct_access() returned %ld\n", nr_pages);
> -- 
> 2.28.0.rc0.12.gb6a658bd00c9
>