linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	houtao1@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] virtiofs: use GFP_NOFS when enqueuing request through kworker
Date: Fri,  5 Jan 2024 18:53:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240105105305.4052672-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com> (raw)

From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>

When invoking virtio_fs_enqueue_req() through kworker, both the
allocation of the sg array and the bounce buffer still use GFP_ATOMIC.
Considering the size of both the sg array and the bounce buffer may be
greater than PAGE_SIZE, use GFP_NOFS instead of GFP_ATOMIC to lower the
possibility of memory allocation failure.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
---
Change log:
v2:
  * pass gfp_t instead of bool to virtio_fs_enqueue_req() (Suggested by Matthew)

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20240104015805.2103766-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com

 fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
index 3aac31d451985..8cf518624ce9e 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
@@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ struct virtio_fs_req_work {
 };
 
 static int virtio_fs_enqueue_req(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq,
-				 struct fuse_req *req, bool in_flight);
+				 struct fuse_req *req, bool in_flight,
+				 gfp_t gfp);
 
 static const struct constant_table dax_param_enums[] = {
 	{"always",	FUSE_DAX_ALWAYS },
@@ -383,7 +384,7 @@ static void virtio_fs_request_dispatch_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		list_del_init(&req->list);
 		spin_unlock(&fsvq->lock);
 
-		ret = virtio_fs_enqueue_req(fsvq, req, true);
+		ret = virtio_fs_enqueue_req(fsvq, req, true, GFP_NOFS);
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			if (ret == -ENOMEM || ret == -ENOSPC) {
 				spin_lock(&fsvq->lock);
@@ -488,7 +489,7 @@ static void virtio_fs_hiprio_dispatch_work(struct work_struct *work)
 }
 
 /* Allocate and copy args into req->argbuf */
-static int copy_args_to_argbuf(struct fuse_req *req)
+static int copy_args_to_argbuf(struct fuse_req *req, gfp_t gfp)
 {
 	struct fuse_args *args = req->args;
 	unsigned int offset = 0;
@@ -502,7 +503,7 @@ static int copy_args_to_argbuf(struct fuse_req *req)
 	len = fuse_len_args(num_in, (struct fuse_arg *) args->in_args) +
 	      fuse_len_args(num_out, args->out_args);
 
-	req->argbuf = kmalloc(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	req->argbuf = kmalloc(len, gfp);
 	if (!req->argbuf)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -1119,7 +1120,8 @@ static unsigned int sg_init_fuse_args(struct scatterlist *sg,
 
 /* Add a request to a virtqueue and kick the device */
 static int virtio_fs_enqueue_req(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq,
-				 struct fuse_req *req, bool in_flight)
+				 struct fuse_req *req, bool in_flight,
+				 gfp_t gfp)
 {
 	/* requests need at least 4 elements */
 	struct scatterlist *stack_sgs[6];
@@ -1140,8 +1142,8 @@ static int virtio_fs_enqueue_req(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq,
 	/* Does the sglist fit on the stack? */
 	total_sgs = sg_count_fuse_req(req);
 	if (total_sgs > ARRAY_SIZE(stack_sgs)) {
-		sgs = kmalloc_array(total_sgs, sizeof(sgs[0]), GFP_ATOMIC);
-		sg = kmalloc_array(total_sgs, sizeof(sg[0]), GFP_ATOMIC);
+		sgs = kmalloc_array(total_sgs, sizeof(sgs[0]), gfp);
+		sg = kmalloc_array(total_sgs, sizeof(sg[0]), gfp);
 		if (!sgs || !sg) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
 			goto out;
@@ -1149,7 +1151,7 @@ static int virtio_fs_enqueue_req(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq,
 	}
 
 	/* Use a bounce buffer since stack args cannot be mapped */
-	ret = copy_args_to_argbuf(req);
+	ret = copy_args_to_argbuf(req, gfp);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
 
@@ -1245,7 +1247,7 @@ __releases(fiq->lock)
 		 fuse_len_args(req->args->out_numargs, req->args->out_args));
 
 	fsvq = &fs->vqs[queue_id];
-	ret = virtio_fs_enqueue_req(fsvq, req, false);
+	ret = virtio_fs_enqueue_req(fsvq, req, false, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		if (ret == -ENOMEM || ret == -ENOSPC) {
 			/*
-- 
2.29.2


             reply	other threads:[~2024-01-05 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-05 10:53 Hou Tao [this message]
2024-01-05 20:17 ` [PATCH v2] virtiofs: use GFP_NOFS when enqueuing request through kworker Vivek Goyal
2024-01-05 20:21   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-01-05 20:41     ` Vivek Goyal
2024-01-05 20:57       ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-01-05 21:27         ` Vivek Goyal
2024-01-06  6:26           ` Hou Tao
2024-01-06  2:48     ` Hou Tao
2024-01-08 15:48 ` Benjamin Coddington

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240105105305.4052672-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=houtao@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).