From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (unknown [45.249.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C245C14A0BE; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714051391; cv=none; b=VolgV/D4bCck/vksh4fafOECQrx5bys06IHJtS6p6k3gqhprgM+CEs8SPoQgZYSN9dSHLYuy2MmO08EI2amnsVT1NaYMe4Bs6GpWEzkg2twFOslmLwD6+ic6bP/TK28oi1zCUXRSsVBknGTwxSsBo2L0BjyrYEnsy52FqOw9uOo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714051391; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JThkkou7zEfOBTy7wi/1jXN7PWKtuoz1Zgbn/+nF5a4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=hzR5XX/zRbCbo4UM6qeQyQUOwx76XPMI+kmxooEI2ogP46cc5bjt5hUDdWqx5GhsXzLou4i8v4Xa8ybIo/0csvP7GyMWMaYY4H7l1pz++NXQN2eIb+uV+ce2O80UnYI+6fuc4JWR07YENkmfkBrz+o5hxwZZhlO5Z0UKggIETAg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.93.142]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VQGkY3wpWz4f3kk7; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:23:01 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8691A016E; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:23:06 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.104.67]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgCXaBEqWSpmHu+2Kw--.61462S10; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:23:06 +0800 (CST) From: Zhang Yi To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, brauner@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, chandanbabu@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, jack@suse.cz, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com, chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH v5 6/9] iomap: don't increase i_size if it's not a write operation Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:13:32 +0800 Message-Id: <20240425131335.878454-7-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240425131335.878454-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com> References: <20240425131335.878454-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:cCh0CgCXaBEqWSpmHu+2Kw--.61462S10 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxWFyxtF4xGrWDWry5KryDZFb_yoWrAw17pr W293yDCan7tFsrWr1kJF98ZFyYka4rKrW7CrW7G3y3ZFn0yr17KF1rGa4Y9as8J3sxAr4f tF4kAa4rWF1UCr7anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUP214x267AKxVWrJVCq3wAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2048vs2IY020E87I2jVAFwI0_JF0E3s1l82xGYI kIc2x26xkF7I0E14v26ryj6s0DM28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2 z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Ar0_tr1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j6F 4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq 3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7 IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4U M4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErcIFxwACI402YVCY1x02628vn2 kIc2xKxwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E 14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jw0_GFylIx kGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUCVW8JwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAF wI0_Cr0_Gr1UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJV W8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4UJVWxJrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7VUbmZ X7UUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: d1lo6xhdqjqx5xdzvxpfor3voofrz/ From: Zhang Yi Increase i_size in iomap_zero_range() and iomap_unshare_iter() is not needed, the caller should handle it. Especially, when truncate partial block, we should not increase i_size beyond the new EOF here. It doesn't affect xfs and gfs2 now because they set the new file size after zero out, it doesn't matter that a transient increase in i_size, but it will affect ext4 because it set file size before truncate. So move the i_size updating logic to iomap_write_iter(). Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong --- fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c index 433eaae39966..63d94189e568 100644 --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c @@ -875,32 +875,13 @@ static size_t iomap_write_end(struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos, size_t len, size_t copied, struct folio *folio) { const struct iomap *srcmap = iomap_iter_srcmap(iter); - loff_t old_size = iter->inode->i_size; - size_t ret; - - if (srcmap->type == IOMAP_INLINE) { - ret = iomap_write_end_inline(iter, folio, pos, copied); - } else if (srcmap->flags & IOMAP_F_BUFFER_HEAD) { - ret = block_write_end(NULL, iter->inode->i_mapping, pos, len, - copied, &folio->page, NULL); - } else { - ret = __iomap_write_end(iter->inode, pos, len, copied, folio); - } - - /* - * Update the in-memory inode size after copying the data into the page - * cache. It's up to the file system to write the updated size to disk, - * preferably after I/O completion so that no stale data is exposed. - */ - if (pos + ret > old_size) { - i_size_write(iter->inode, pos + ret); - iter->iomap.flags |= IOMAP_F_SIZE_CHANGED; - } - __iomap_put_folio(iter, pos, ret, folio); - if (old_size < pos) - pagecache_isize_extended(iter->inode, old_size, pos); - return ret; + if (srcmap->type == IOMAP_INLINE) + return iomap_write_end_inline(iter, folio, pos, copied); + if (srcmap->flags & IOMAP_F_BUFFER_HEAD) + return block_write_end(NULL, iter->inode->i_mapping, pos, len, + copied, &folio->page, NULL); + return __iomap_write_end(iter->inode, pos, len, copied, folio); } static loff_t iomap_write_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iov_iter *i) @@ -915,6 +896,7 @@ static loff_t iomap_write_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iov_iter *i) do { struct folio *folio; + loff_t old_size; size_t offset; /* Offset into folio */ size_t bytes; /* Bytes to write to folio */ size_t copied; /* Bytes copied from user */ @@ -964,6 +946,22 @@ static loff_t iomap_write_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iov_iter *i) copied = copy_folio_from_iter_atomic(folio, offset, bytes, i); status = iomap_write_end(iter, pos, bytes, copied, folio); + /* + * Update the in-memory inode size after copying the data into + * the page cache. It's up to the file system to write the + * updated size to disk, preferably after I/O completion so that + * no stale data is exposed. Only once that's done can we + * unlock and release the folio. + */ + old_size = iter->inode->i_size; + if (pos + status > old_size) { + i_size_write(iter->inode, pos + status); + iter->iomap.flags |= IOMAP_F_SIZE_CHANGED; + } + __iomap_put_folio(iter, pos, status, folio); + + if (old_size < pos) + pagecache_isize_extended(iter->inode, old_size, pos); if (status < bytes) iomap_write_failed(iter->inode, pos + status, bytes - status); @@ -1336,6 +1334,7 @@ static loff_t iomap_unshare_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter) bytes = folio_size(folio) - offset; bytes = iomap_write_end(iter, pos, bytes, bytes, folio); + __iomap_put_folio(iter, pos, bytes, folio); if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bytes == 0)) return -EIO; @@ -1400,6 +1399,7 @@ static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero) folio_mark_accessed(folio); bytes = iomap_write_end(iter, pos, bytes, bytes, folio); + __iomap_put_folio(iter, pos, bytes, folio); if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bytes == 0)) return -EIO; -- 2.39.2