From: Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com> To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: "Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, "Paul Elliott" <paul.elliott@arm.com>, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>, "Yu-cheng Yu" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>, "Vincenzo Frascino" <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>, "Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@redhat.com>, "Szabolcs Nagy" <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>, "H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>, "Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>, "Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>, "Kristina Martšenko" <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>, "Sudakshina Das" <sudi.das@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Dave Martin" <Dave.Martin@arm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/11] arm64: elf: Enable BTI at exec based on ELF program properties Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:58:50 +0530 Message-ID: <275b9cdb-7835-0dfe-9bea-acb0d8301e36@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200212192906.53366-6-broonie@kernel.org> On 2/13/20 12:59 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> > > For BTI protection to be as comprehensive as possible, it is > desirable to have BTI enabled from process startup. If this is not > done, the process must use mprotect() to enable BTI for each of its > executable mappings, but this is painful to do in the libc startup > code. It's simpler and more sound to have the kernel do it > instead. > > To this end, detect BTI support in the executable (or ELF > interpreter, as appropriate), via the > NT_GNU_PROGRAM_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note, and tweak the initial prot > flags for the process' executable pages to include PROT_BTI as > appropriate. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> > --- > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 3 +++ > arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 19 ++++++++++++++ > include/linux/elf.h | 6 ++++- > include/uapi/linux/elf.h | 6 +++++ > 5 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > index e37f4f07b990..d65d226a77ec 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ config ARM64 > select ACPI_MCFG if (ACPI && PCI) > select ACPI_SPCR_TABLE if ACPI > select ACPI_PPTT if ACPI > + select ARCH_BINFMT_ELF_STATE > select ARCH_CLOCKSOURCE_DATA > select ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VIRTUAL > select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED > @@ -33,6 +34,7 @@ config ARM64 > select ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER > select ARCH_HAS_TEARDOWN_DMA_OPS if IOMMU_SUPPORT > select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST > + select ARCH_HAVE_ELF_PROT > select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG > select ARCH_INLINE_READ_LOCK if !PREEMPTION > select ARCH_INLINE_READ_LOCK_BH if !PREEMPTION > @@ -62,6 +64,7 @@ config ARM64 > select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE if !PREEMPTION > select ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK > select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF > + select ARCH_USE_GNU_PROPERTY if BINFMT_ELF > select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_RWLOCKS > select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS > select ARCH_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h > index b618017205a3..fca3a48e9db5 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h > @@ -114,7 +114,11 @@ > > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ > > +#include <uapi/linux/elf.h> > #include <linux/bug.h> > +#include <linux/errno.h> > +#include <linux/fs.h> > +#include <linux/types.h> > #include <asm/processor.h> /* for signal_minsigstksz, used by ARCH_DLINFO */ > > typedef unsigned long elf_greg_t; > @@ -224,6 +228,52 @@ extern int aarch32_setup_additional_pages(struct linux_binprm *bprm, > > #endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */ > > +struct arch_elf_state { > + int flags; > +}; > + > +#define ARM64_ELF_BTI (1 << 0) > + > +#define INIT_ARCH_ELF_STATE { \ > + .flags = 0, \ > +} > + > +static inline int arch_parse_elf_property(u32 type, const void *data, > + size_t datasz, bool compat, > + struct arch_elf_state *arch) > +{ Does this check here make sense to skip running extra code? if (!system_supports_bti()) return 0; Although this check is there in arch_validate_prot. > + /* No known properties for AArch32 yet */ > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && compat) > + return 0; > + > + if (type == GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_AND) { > + const u32 *p = data; > + > + if (datasz != sizeof(*p)) > + return -ENOEXEC; > + > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI) && > + (*p & GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_BTI)) > + arch->flags |= ARM64_ELF_BTI; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static inline int arch_elf_pt_proc(void *ehdr, void *phdr, > + struct file *f, bool is_interp, > + struct arch_elf_state *state) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > + > +static inline int arch_check_elf(void *ehdr, bool has_interp, > + void *interp_ehdr, > + struct arch_elf_state *state) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > + > #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */ > > #endif > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > index bbb0f0c145f6..7545a3f743c4 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > > #include <linux/compat.h> > #include <linux/efi.h> > +#include <linux/elf.h> > #include <linux/export.h> > #include <linux/sched.h> > #include <linux/sched/debug.h> > @@ -18,6 +19,7 @@ > #include <linux/sched/task_stack.h> > #include <linux/kernel.h> > #include <linux/lockdep.h> > +#include <linux/mman.h> > #include <linux/mm.h> > #include <linux/stddef.h> > #include <linux/sysctl.h> > @@ -649,3 +651,20 @@ asmlinkage void __sched arm64_preempt_schedule_irq(void) > if (system_capabilities_finalized()) > preempt_schedule_irq(); > } > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF > +int arch_elf_adjust_prot(int prot, const struct arch_elf_state *state, > + bool has_interp, bool is_interp) > +{ > + if (is_interp != has_interp) > + return prot; > + > + if (!(state->flags & ARM64_ELF_BTI)) > + return prot; > + > + if (prot & PROT_EXEC) > + prot |= PROT_BTI; > + > + return prot; > +} > +#endif > diff --git a/include/linux/elf.h b/include/linux/elf.h > index 1b6e8955c597..5d5b0321da0b 100644 > --- a/include/linux/elf.h > +++ b/include/linux/elf.h > @@ -63,7 +63,11 @@ extern int elf_coredump_extra_notes_size(void); > extern int elf_coredump_extra_notes_write(struct coredump_params *cprm); > #endif > > -/* NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 header */ > +/* > + * NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 header: > + * Keep this internal until/unless there is an agreed UAPI definition. > + * pr_type values (GNU_PROPERTY_*) are public and defined in the UAPI header. > + */ > struct gnu_property { > u32 pr_type; > u32 pr_datasz; > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/elf.h b/include/uapi/linux/elf.h > index 20900f4496b7..c6dd0215482e 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/elf.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/elf.h > @@ -448,4 +448,10 @@ typedef struct elf64_note { > Elf64_Word n_type; /* Content type */ > } Elf64_Nhdr; > > +/* .note.gnu.property types for EM_AARCH64: */ > +#define GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_AND 0xc0000000 > + > +/* Bits for GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_BTI */ > +#define GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_BTI (1U << 0) > + > #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_ELF_H */ >
next prev parent reply index Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-02-12 19:28 [PATCH v6 00/11] arm64: Branch Target Identification support Mark Brown 2020-02-12 19:28 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program properties Mark Brown 2020-02-26 5:49 ` Kees Cook 2020-02-26 11:20 ` Mark Brown 2020-02-12 19:28 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] ELF: Add ELF program property parsing support Mark Brown 2020-02-12 19:28 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] arm64: Basic Branch Target Identification support Mark Brown 2020-02-12 19:28 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] elf: Allow arch to tweak initial mmap prot flags Mark Brown 2020-02-12 19:29 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] arm64: elf: Enable BTI at exec based on ELF program properties Mark Brown 2020-02-25 13:28 ` Amit Kachhap [this message] 2020-02-25 17:27 ` Mark Brown 2020-02-26 5:47 ` Kees Cook 2020-02-12 19:29 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] arm64: BTI: Decode BTYPE bits when printing PSTATE Mark Brown 2020-02-12 19:29 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] arm64: unify native/compat instruction skipping Mark Brown 2020-02-12 19:29 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] arm64: traps: Shuffle code to eliminate forward declarations Mark Brown 2020-02-12 19:29 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions Mark Brown 2020-02-12 19:29 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] KVM: " Mark Brown 2020-02-15 11:56 ` Marc Zyngier 2020-02-12 19:29 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] arm64: mm: Display guarded pages in ptdump Mark Brown
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=275b9cdb-7835-0dfe-9bea-acb0d8301e36@arm.com \ --to=amit.kachhap@arm.com \ --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=drjones@redhat.com \ --cc=esyr@redhat.com \ --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \ --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \ --cc=jannh@google.com \ --cc=keescook@chromium.org \ --cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \ --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=paul.elliott@arm.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \ --cc=sudi.das@arm.com \ --cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \ --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Linux-Fsdevel Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/0 linux-fsdevel/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 linux-fsdevel linux-fsdevel/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel \ linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org public-inbox-index linux-fsdevel Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git