From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56242 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726503AbeJJTSV (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:18:21 -0400
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <de050902-f3d0-b2db-2627-983a36c87b3c@gmail.com>
References: <de050902-f3d0-b2db-2627-983a36c87b3c@gmail.com> <153754740781.17872.7869536526927736855.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <153754743491.17872.12115848333103740766.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
To: Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, ebiederm@xmission.com,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        mszeredi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/34] teach move_mount(2) to work with OPEN_TREE_CLONE [ver #12]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <30812.1539172590.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 12:56:30 +0100
Message-ID: <30813.1539172590@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com> wrote:

> I replied last time to wonder about the MNT_UMOUNT mnt_flag. So I've tested it
> now :-), on David's current tree (commit 5581f4935add).
> 
> The modified do_move_mount() allows re-attaching something that was
> lazy-unmounted. But the lazy unmount sets MNT_UMOUNT. And this flag is not
> cleared when the mount is re-attached.

Sorry, yes.  I'm not sure what the best way to deal with this is.  Should it
just return -EPERM or -ESTALE if MNT_UMOUNT is set?

David