linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, joshi.k@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk: optimization for classic polling
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 12:37:07 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35a2d52e-dd40-d130-85d9-5f3ffe0d28af@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180220132137.GG25314@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 2/20/18 3:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2083 at 09:51:06AM +0530, Nitesh Shetty wrote:
>> This removes the dependency on interrupts to wake up task. Set task
>> state as TASK_RUNNING, if need_resched() returns true,
>> while polling for IO completion.
>> Earlier, polling task used to sleep, relying on interrupt to wake it up.
>> This made some IO take very long when interrupt-coalescing is enabled in
>> NVMe.
> 
> This is a horrible Changelog.. it does not in fact explain why the patch
> works or is correct.

Yeah, that should have been improved.

> Also, set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING) is dodgy (similarly in
> __blk_mq_poll), why do you need that memory barrier?

I pointed that out in the review, and v2 fixed it. v2 is the
one that got merged.

-- 
Jens Axboe

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-20 22:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20180208143655epcas1p444bf34705526b7839a5a135f82761aad@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2083-05-30  4:21 ` [PATCH] blk: optimization for classic polling Nitesh Shetty
2018-02-08 15:27   ` Keith Busch
2018-02-08 16:03     ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-02-12 15:50   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-20 13:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-20 16:27     ` Keith Busch
2018-02-20 22:37     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2018-02-21  8:32       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-10 18:52   ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=35a2d52e-dd40-d130-85d9-5f3ffe0d28af@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nj.shetty@samsung.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).