From: Boaz Harrosh <openosd@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [POC][PATCH] xfs: reduce ilock contention on buffered randrw workload
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 13:55:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e7529e5-cd31-5085-ca20-5ca23115c044@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408110322.GA18662@quack2.suse.cz>
On 08/04/19 14:03, Jan Kara wrote:
<>
> Hum, you are right. Ext4 is buggy in this regard. I've fixed the race for
> page fault in ea3d7209ca01 "ext4: fix races between page faults and hole
> punching" but didn't realize the problem is there for buffered reads as
> well. I'll think how we can fix this. Thanks for noticing this!
>
This is very interesting. Please CC me if you have devised a test for this?
For a long time I want to enhance fsstress --verify that each writer always
writes the long address it writes to as data (ie. file looks like an increasing
long counter) And readers want to see only this pattern or zero.
> Honza
>
Thanks
Boaz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-22 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-04 16:57 Amir Goldstein
2019-04-04 21:17 ` Dave Chinner
2019-04-05 14:02 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-04-07 23:27 ` Dave Chinner
2019-04-08 9:02 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-04-08 14:11 ` Jan Kara
2019-04-08 17:41 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-04-09 8:26 ` Jan Kara
2022-06-17 14:48 ` Amir Goldstein
2022-06-17 15:11 ` Jan Kara
2022-06-18 8:38 ` Amir Goldstein
2022-06-20 9:11 ` Jan Kara
2022-06-21 7:49 ` Amir Goldstein
2022-06-21 8:59 ` Jan Kara
2022-06-21 12:53 ` Amir Goldstein
2022-06-22 3:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-06-22 9:00 ` Amir Goldstein
2022-06-22 9:34 ` Jan Kara
2022-06-22 16:26 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-04-08 11:03 ` Jan Kara
2019-04-22 10:55 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2019-04-08 10:33 ` Jan Kara
2019-04-08 16:37 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2019-04-11 1:11 ` Dave Chinner
2019-04-16 12:22 ` Dave Chinner
2019-04-18 3:10 ` Dave Chinner
2019-04-18 18:21 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2019-04-20 23:54 ` Dave Chinner
2019-05-03 4:17 ` Dave Chinner
2019-05-03 5:17 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e7529e5-cd31-5085-ca20-5ca23115c044@gmail.com \
--to=openosd@gmail.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--subject='Re: [POC][PATCH] xfs: reduce ilock contention on buffered randrw workload' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).