From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/20] sysfs: Remove now unnecessary error reporting suppression. Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 14:37:34 +0900 Message-ID: <4A14E89E.7010600@kernel.org> References: <1242865694-2100-1-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com> <1242865694-2100-2-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com> <1242865694-2100-3-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Morton , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cornelia Huck , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" To: "Eric W. Biederman" Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:38409 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750853AbZEUFhn (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2009 01:37:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1242865694-2100-3-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Eric W. Biederman wrote: > From: Eric W. Biederman > > Now that we use sysfs_rename_link in the places we previously > used sysfs_create_link_nowarn we can remove sysfs_create_link_nowarn > and all it's supporting infrastructure. I'm not entirely sure why implementing a rename helper means that we don't need nowarn version anymore. Nothing really changed or is it that the nowarn version wasn't too necessary anyway? Thanks. -- tejun