From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Artem Bityutskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] periodic write-back timer optimization Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:34:35 +0300 Message-ID: <4A1E307B.1060807@nokia.com> References: <20090527130503.4913.62042.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <200905271323.29818.arnd@arndb.de> <4A1D31BA.6060903@nokia.com> <20090527123320.GF11363@kernel.dk> <4A1D3418.8060909@nokia.com> <20090527124719.GH11363@kernel.dk> Reply-To: Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jens Axboe , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" To: Christoph Hellwig , viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233]:51748 "EHLO mgw-mx06.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761436AbZE1GfY (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2009 02:35:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090527124719.GH11363@kernel.dk> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jens Axboe wrote: > That would be great, I would have no problem integrating such a featu= re. > It definitely makes sense. Hi Al, Christoph, unless you have objections against the whole idea, I wonder if it would be possible to make the patches which wrap sb->s_dirt usage go via VFS tree first, and then I'd continue the timer optimization work separately. IMO, wrapping s_dirt makes sense in general. I mean, patches 01-17 from this series. --=20 Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=90=D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC =D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E= =D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html