From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5A8C433E0 for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 01:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E122067B for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 01:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728908AbgFGBO7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jun 2020 21:14:59 -0400 Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp ([202.181.97.72]:54425 "EHLO www262.sakura.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728723AbgFGBO7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jun 2020 21:14:59 -0400 Received: from fsav404.sakura.ne.jp (fsav404.sakura.ne.jp [133.242.250.103]) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0571DtHP003723; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 10:13:55 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp (202.181.97.72) by fsav404.sakura.ne.jp (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/fsav404.sakura.ne.jp); Sun, 07 Jun 2020 10:13:55 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/fsav404.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (M106072142033.v4.enabler.ne.jp [106.72.142.33]) (authenticated bits=0) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 0571Dnfn003612 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 7 Jun 2020 10:13:55 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp) Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] net/bpfilter: Remove this broken and apparently unmantained To: Bruno Meneguele Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Kees Cook , akpm@linux-foundation.org, ast@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, bpf , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann , Jakub Kicinski , Masahiro Yamada , Gary Lin , Linus Torvalds References: <20200329005528.xeKtdz2A0%akpm@linux-foundation.org> <13fb3ab7-9ab1-b25f-52f2-40a6ca5655e1@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> <202006051903.C44988B@keescook> <875zc4c86z.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> From: Tetsuo Handa Message-ID: <4a82a143-29f1-6f5c-a83f-0cede795c262@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 10:13:46 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <875zc4c86z.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/06/07 4:20, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Kees, Tesuo. Unless someone chimes in and says they care I will > rebase this patch onto -rc1 to ensure I haven't missed something > because of the merge window and send this to Linus. Is the exec support of bpfilter already supported by distributions? I can see that RHEL8's 4.18 kernel contains several changelogs ( https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel/blob/c8/f/SPECS/kernel.spec ) that might be relevant to the exec support of bpfilter. If it is not supported yet, removing the code would be a choice.