From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096C2C3A589 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC78620B7C for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726747AbfHRSAg convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:00:36 -0400 Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([195.201.40.130]:35312 "EHLO lithops.sigma-star.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726005AbfHRSAf (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:00:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1ED608311C; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 20:00:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 4gGs7GazpkF2; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 20:00:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2846083139; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 20:00:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Uj_qxmxjUq0m; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 20:00:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at (lithops.sigma-star.at [195.201.40.130]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097BB608311C; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 20:00:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 20:00:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Richard Weinberger To: tytso Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Gao Xiang , Jan Kara , Chao Yu , Dave Chinner , David Sterba , Miao Xie , devel , Stephen Rothwell , Darrick , Christoph Hellwig , Amir Goldstein , linux-erofs , Al Viro , Jaegeuk Kim , linux-kernel , Li Guifu , Fang Wei , Pavel Machek , linux-fsdevel , Andrew Morton , torvalds Message-ID: <538856932.69442.1566151228866.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> In-Reply-To: <20190818174621.GB12940@mit.edu> References: <20190817082313.21040-1-hsiangkao@aol.com> <20190818084521.GA17909@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> <1133002215.69049.1566119033047.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20190818090949.GA30276@kroah.com> <790210571.69061.1566120073465.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20190818151154.GA32157@mit.edu> <1897345637.69314.1566148000847.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20190818174621.GB12940@mit.edu> Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs: move erofs out of staging MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Originating-IP: [195.201.40.130] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.12_GA_3807 (ZimbraWebClient - FF60 (Linux)/8.8.12_GA_3809) Thread-Topic: erofs: move erofs out of staging Thread-Index: sAbiegKjjTKQmAd1TwyH6s3S7iROUA== Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > Von: "tytso" > An: "richard" > CC: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , "Gao Xiang" , "Jan Kara" , "Chao > Yu" , "Dave Chinner" , "David Sterba" , "Miao Xie" > , "devel" , "Stephen Rothwell" , "Darrick" > , "Christoph Hellwig" , "Amir Goldstein" , > "linux-erofs" , "Al Viro" , "Jaegeuk Kim" , > "linux-kernel" , "Li Guifu" , "Fang Wei" , > "Pavel Machek" , "linux-fsdevel" , "Andrew Morton" > , "torvalds" > Gesendet: Sonntag, 18. August 2019 19:46:21 > Betreff: Re: [PATCH] erofs: move erofs out of staging > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 07:06:40PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> > So holding a file system like EROFS to a higher standard than say, >> > ext4, xfs, or btrfs hardly seems fair. >> >> Nobody claimed that. > > Pointing out that erofs has issues in this area when Gao Xiang is > asking if erofs can be moved out of staging and join the "official > clubhouse" of file systems could certainly be reasonable interpreted > as such. Reporting such vulnerablities are a good thing, and > hopefully all file system maintainers will welcome them. Doing them > on a e-mail thread about promoting out of erofs is certainly going to > lead to inferences of a double standard. Well, this was not at all my intention. erofs raised my attention and instead of wasting a new thread I answered here and reported what I found while looking at it. That's all. Thanks, //richard