From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Phillips Subject: Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?) Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 06:15:04 -0700 Message-ID: <55534E58.1070702@phunq.net> References: <20150430002008.GY15810@dastard> <1430395641.3180.94.camel@gmail.com> <1430401693.3180.131.camel@gmail.com> <55423732.2070509@phunq.net> <55423C05.1000506@symas.com> <554246D7.40105@phunq.net> <20150511221223.GD4434@amd> <555140E6.1070409@phunq.net> <20150513072539.GC19700@amd> <555335FA.3060005@phunq.net> <1431522484.3188.75.camel@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Howard Chu , Dave Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek , tux3@tux3.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, OGAWA Hirofumi To: Mike Galbraith Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1431522484.3188.75.camel@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tux3-bounces@phunq.net Sender: "Tux3" List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 05/13/2015 06:08 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 04:31 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote: >> Third possibility: build from our repository, as Mike did. > > Sorry about that folks. I've lost all interest, it won't happen again. Thanks for your valuable contribution. Now we are seeing a steady of stream of people heading to the repository, after you showed it could be done. Regards, Daniel