linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
	linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Revert "aio: block exit_aio() until all context requests are completed"
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 09:16:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55575F3C.6020107@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55561038.5080602@de.ibm.com>

On 05/15/2015 09:26 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 15.05.2015 um 15:42 schrieb Jeff Moyer:
>> Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> writes:
>>
>>> I see a significant latency (can be minutes with 2000 disks and HZ=100)
>>> when exiting a QEMU process that has lots of disk devices via aio. The
>>> process sits idle doing nothing as zombie in exit_aio waiting for the
>>> completion.
>>>
>>> Turns out that
>>> commit 6098b45b32 ("aio: block exit_aio() until all context requests are
>>> completed") caused the delay.
>>>
>>> Patch description was:
>>>
>>> It seems that exit_aio() also needs to wait for all iocbs to complete (like
>>> io_destroy), but we missed the wait step in current implemention, so fix
>>> it in the same way as we did in io_destroy.
>>>
>>> Now: io_destroy requires to block until everything is cleaned up from its
>>> interface description in the manpage:
>>> DESCRIPTION
>>> The  io_destroy()  system call will attempt to cancel all outstanding
>>> asynchronous I/O operations against ctx_id, will block on the completion
>>> of all operations that could not be canceled, and will destroy the ctx_id.
>>>
>>> Does process exit require the same full blocking? We might be able to
>>> cleanup the process and let the aio data structures be freed lazily.
>>> Opinions or better ideas?
>>
>> This has already been fixed:
>>
>> commit dc48e56d761610da4ea1088d1bea0a030b8e3e43
>> Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
>> Date:   Wed Apr 15 11:17:23 2015 -0600
>>
>>      aio: fix serial draining in exit_aio()
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jeff
>>
> Cool thanks. As the original patch had cc stable, shouldnt the fix also be backported?

I'll email stable.

-- 
Jens Axboe


      reply	other threads:[~2015-05-16 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1431675417-30464-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
2015-05-15  7:41 ` Revert "aio: block exit_aio() until all context requests are completed" Christian Borntraeger
2015-05-15 13:42   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-05-15 15:26     ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-05-16 15:16       ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55575F3C.6020107@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).