From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] new mount API
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 21:42:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5973.1535316177@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87va7xx15h.fsf@xmission.com>
Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> I just noticed that this tree reintroduces bugs that were fixed with
> cfb2f6f6e0ba ("Revert "mqueue: switch to on-demand creation of internal
> mount"")
>
> So in addition to ongoing discussion about what the new mount api should
> look like ...
Which don't need to be solved *before* the current patches go in. No strong
reason has been given why the desired changes cannot wait one cycle.
The core needs to be upstream before we can start porting most of the
filesystems to it.
> ... we have bugs in the implementation.
Allegedly. It would be useful if you could've pointed out what it was that
you think you see. I don't see offhand what it reintroduces.
And how come this hasn't been noticed since the patches have been sat in
linux-next for a while?
> This really does not look like this branch is ready to be merged yet.
I disagree (probably obviously).
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-27 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-23 22:31 [git pull] new mount API Al Viro
2018-08-23 23:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-24 0:08 ` David Howells
2018-08-24 0:16 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-24 0:31 ` Al Viro
2018-08-24 2:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-24 3:13 ` Al Viro
2018-08-24 4:51 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-24 6:05 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-08-24 8:38 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-08-24 8:56 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-08-24 9:29 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-08-24 9:45 ` David Howells
2018-08-24 10:06 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-08-24 14:18 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-08-24 14:26 ` Karel Zak
2018-08-24 14:26 ` David Howells
2018-08-24 14:30 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-08-24 14:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-24 15:02 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-08-24 15:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-24 17:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-08-24 17:10 ` David Howells
2018-08-24 17:43 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-24 19:25 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-08-24 19:51 ` Al Viro
2018-08-29 12:32 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-08-26 3:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-08-26 20:42 ` David Howells [this message]
2018-08-26 20:46 ` David Howells
2018-08-26 21:03 ` [PATCH] mqueue: Fix bug from mount API conversion David Howells
2018-08-26 21:22 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5973.1535316177@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).