From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:45509 "EHLO out2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751198AbeENFtG (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2018 01:49:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] autofs4 - merge auto_fs.h and auto_fs4.h To: Al Viro Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-fsdevel , autofs mailing list , Kernel Mailing List References: <152626703024.28589.9571964661718767929.stgit@pluto.themaw.net> <20180514031509.GC30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> From: Ian Kent Message-ID: <5a7355b4-7bf1-c911-e010-263e3380794a@themaw.net> Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 13:49:00 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180514031509.GC30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 14/05/18 11:15, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:03:50AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: >> The autofs module has long since been removed so there's no need to have >> two separate include files for autofs. > > Umm... Why does fs/compat_ioctl.c need either include, actually? > >> --- a/fs/compat_ioctl.c >> +++ b/fs/compat_ioctl.c >> @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ >> #include >> #include >> #include >> -#include >> #include >> #include >> #include > > AFAICS, we can just delete both. Matter of fact, a *lot* of those includes are > pointless nowadays... > OK, I'll have a look at that and post a follow up patch. Thanks for having a look at these Al.