linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/6] mm: split SWP_FILE into SWP_ACTIVATED and SWP_FS
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 12:11:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6fe668b5-f94a-0473-f9ab-a0e2b355ab91@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <289f334fa8e5d1239eab667415d287edf0e13f14.1527197312.git.osandov@fb.com>



On 25.05.2018 00:41, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> 
> The SWP_FILE flag serves two purposes: to make swap_{read,write}page()
> go through the filesystem, and to make swapoff() call
> ->swap_deactivate(). For Btrfs, we want the latter but not the former,
> so split this flag into two. This makes us always call
> ->swap_deactivate() if ->swap_activate() succeeded, not just if it
> didn't add any swap extents itself.
> 
> This also resolves the issue of the very misleading name of SWP_FILE,
> which is only used for swap files over NFS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>

Generally looks good:

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>

just one cleanup suggestion, see below.
> ---
>  include/linux/swap.h | 13 +++++++------
>  mm/page_io.c         |  6 +++---
>  mm/swapfile.c        | 13 ++++++++-----
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> index 2417d288e016..29dfd436435c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -167,13 +167,14 @@ enum {
>  	SWP_SOLIDSTATE	= (1 << 4),	/* blkdev seeks are cheap */
>  	SWP_CONTINUED	= (1 << 5),	/* swap_map has count continuation */
>  	SWP_BLKDEV	= (1 << 6),	/* its a block device */
> -	SWP_FILE	= (1 << 7),	/* set after swap_activate success */
> -	SWP_AREA_DISCARD = (1 << 8),	/* single-time swap area discards */
> -	SWP_PAGE_DISCARD = (1 << 9),	/* freed swap page-cluster discards */
> -	SWP_STABLE_WRITES = (1 << 10),	/* no overwrite PG_writeback pages */
> -	SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO = (1 << 11),	/* synchronous IO is efficient */
> +	SWP_ACTIVATED	= (1 << 7),	/* set after swap_activate success */
> +	SWP_FS		= (1 << 8),	/* swap file goes through fs */
> +	SWP_AREA_DISCARD = (1 << 9),	/* single-time swap area discards */
> +	SWP_PAGE_DISCARD = (1 << 10),	/* freed swap page-cluster discards */
> +	SWP_STABLE_WRITES = (1 << 11),	/* no overwrite PG_writeback pages */
> +	SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO = (1 << 12),	/* synchronous IO is efficient */
>  					/* add others here before... */
> -	SWP_SCANNING	= (1 << 12),	/* refcount in scan_swap_map */
> +	SWP_SCANNING	= (1 << 13),	/* refcount in scan_swap_map */
>  };
>  
>  #define SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX 32UL
> diff --git a/mm/page_io.c b/mm/page_io.c
> index b41cf9644585..f2d06c1d0cc1 100644
> --- a/mm/page_io.c
> +++ b/mm/page_io.c
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ int __swap_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc,
>  	struct swap_info_struct *sis = page_swap_info(page);
>  
>  	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageSwapCache(page), page);
> -	if (sis->flags & SWP_FILE) {
> +	if (sis->flags & SWP_FS) {

Not necessarily for this series but something to keep in mind:

nit: The way the fs case is tucked onto the __swap_writepage is a bit
ugly. How about factoring out the filesystem/blockdev casae into two
functions :

__swap_writepage_fs/__swap_writepage_bdev

then in swap_writepage we just have the if (sis->flags & SWP_FS) check
and dispatch to either write_page_fs or writepage_bdev.


>  		struct kiocb kiocb;
>  		struct file *swap_file = sis->swap_file;
>  		struct address_space *mapping = swap_file->f_mapping;
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ int swap_readpage(struct page *page, bool synchronous)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (sis->flags & SWP_FILE) {
> +	if (sis->flags & SWP_FS) {
>  		struct file *swap_file = sis->swap_file;
>  		struct address_space *mapping = swap_file->f_mapping;
>  
> @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ int swap_set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
>  {
>  	struct swap_info_struct *sis = page_swap_info(page);
>  
> -	if (sis->flags & SWP_FILE) {
> +	if (sis->flags & SWP_FS) {
>  		struct address_space *mapping = sis->swap_file->f_mapping;
>  
>  		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageSwapCache(page), page);
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index cc2cf04d9018..886c9d89b144 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -973,7 +973,7 @@ int get_swap_pages(int n_goal, bool cluster, swp_entry_t swp_entries[])
>  			goto nextsi;
>  		}
>  		if (cluster) {
> -			if (!(si->flags & SWP_FILE))
> +			if (!(si->flags & SWP_FS))
>  				n_ret = swap_alloc_cluster(si, swp_entries);
>  		} else
>  			n_ret = scan_swap_map_slots(si, SWAP_HAS_CACHE,
> @@ -2327,12 +2327,13 @@ static void destroy_swap_extents(struct swap_info_struct *sis)
>  		kfree(se);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (sis->flags & SWP_FILE) {
> +	if (sis->flags & SWP_ACTIVATED) {
>  		struct file *swap_file = sis->swap_file;
>  		struct address_space *mapping = swap_file->f_mapping;
>  
> -		sis->flags &= ~SWP_FILE;
> -		mapping->a_ops->swap_deactivate(swap_file);
> +		sis->flags &= ~SWP_ACTIVATED;
> +		if (mapping->a_ops->swap_deactivate)
> +			mapping->a_ops->swap_deactivate(swap_file);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -2428,8 +2429,10 @@ static int setup_swap_extents(struct swap_info_struct *sis, sector_t *span)
>  
>  	if (mapping->a_ops->swap_activate) {
>  		ret = mapping->a_ops->swap_activate(sis, swap_file, span);
> +		if (ret >= 0)
> +			sis->flags |= SWP_ACTIVATED;
>  		if (!ret) {
> -			sis->flags |= SWP_FILE;
> +			sis->flags |= SWP_FS;
>  			ret = add_swap_extent(sis, 0, sis->max, 0);
>  			*span = sis->pages;
>  		}
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-25  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-24 21:41 [RFC PATCH v4 0/6] Btrfs: implement swap file support Omar Sandoval
2018-05-24 21:41 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/6] mm: split SWP_FILE into SWP_ACTIVATED and SWP_FS Omar Sandoval
2018-05-25  9:11   ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2018-05-24 21:41 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/6] vfs: update swap_{,de}activate documentation Omar Sandoval
2018-05-25  9:15   ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-05-24 21:41 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/6] Btrfs: push EXCL_OP set into btrfs_rm_device() Omar Sandoval
2018-05-25  9:19   ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-05-28 13:29   ` David Sterba
2018-05-24 21:41 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/6] Btrfs: prevent ioctls from interfering with a swap file Omar Sandoval
2018-05-25 14:50   ` David Sterba
2018-05-25 16:00     ` Omar Sandoval
2018-05-25 16:10       ` David Sterba
2018-08-21  8:46         ` Omar Sandoval
2018-05-24 21:41 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/6] Btrfs: rename get_chunk_map() and make it non-static Omar Sandoval
2018-05-25  9:21   ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-05-25 16:02     ` Omar Sandoval
2018-05-24 21:41 ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/6] Btrfs: support swap files Omar Sandoval
2018-05-25 10:07   ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-05-25 16:16     ` Omar Sandoval
2018-05-28 13:46   ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6fe668b5-f94a-0473-f9ab-a0e2b355ab91@suse.com \
    --to=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/6] mm: split SWP_FILE into SWP_ACTIVATED and SWP_FS' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).