From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:56437 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725878AbeLECwf (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2018 21:52:35 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/38] LSM: Module stacking for SARA and Landlock To: Casey Schaufler , Kees Cook Cc: James Morris , linux-security-module , LKML , SE Linux , Tetsuo Handa , Paul Moore , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Stephen Smalley , Alexey Dobriyan , =?UTF-8?Q?Micka=c3=abl_Sala=c3=bcn?= , Salvatore Mesoraca References: <50db058a-7dde-441b-a7f9-f6837fe8b69f@schaufler-ca.com> From: John Johansen Message-ID: <71c9d3b9-99bd-ec08-cb5e-52d909476d5f@canonical.com> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 18:52:22 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/4/18 6:37 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote: > On 12/4/2018 4:31 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:22 PM Casey Schaufler wrote: >>> v5: Include Kees Cook's rework of the lsm command >>> line interface. Stacking is not conditional. >> Can you resend this series with corrected "From:" lines in the body, etc? > > Yes, I can. I was hoping to hear something other than crickets. > I am trying to get to it, its the next thing on my list. So hopefully this week >> Beyond that, I obviously like it. James, what's needed for this to move forward? > > Agreed. >