From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837F3C282CE for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5FD2089F for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732607AbfDXO63 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:58:29 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:48056 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1733107AbfDXO6Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:58:24 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3OEsetY104944 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:58:23 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2s2r6u6d0h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:58:23 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 15:58:21 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 24 Apr 2019 15:58:16 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x3OEwFZG11206870 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:58:15 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3F34C058; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:58:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EABB4C040; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:58:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.85.81.252]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:58:13 +0000 (GMT) From: Chandan Rajendra To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, ebiggers@kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org, yuchao0@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 02/14] Consolidate "post read processing" into a new file Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 20:29:10 +0530 Organization: IBM In-Reply-To: <20190424142423.GA12761@infradead.org> References: <20190424043730.13683-1-chandan@linux.ibm.com> <6353008.fQNhCuxumZ@localhost.localdomain> <20190424142423.GA12761@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19042414-0016-0000-0000-000002732725 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19042414-0017-0000-0000-000032CF99D4 Message-Id: <7402364.ucYHGh3o57@localhost.localdomain> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-04-24_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904240116 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, April 24, 2019 7:54:23 PM IST Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 03:34:17PM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote: > > To clarify, Are you suggesting that a new kconfig option (say > > CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS) be provided to the user so that the following could > > occur, > > > > 1. User selects CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION and/or CONFIG_FS_VERITY and this causes > > CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS to be set to 'y'. > > 2. User selects CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS explicitly. > > If you don't add a user description to a Kconfig entry it won't be > visible to users, but only selectable by other options. That is what > I suggest. > > Thanks for the clarification. I will make the necessary changes. -- chandan