From: Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>,
lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] FS, MM, and stable trees
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 23:46:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <79d10599-70d2-7d06-1cee-6e52d36233bf@jonmasters.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190213195232.GA10047@kroah.com>
On 2/13/19 2:52 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:25:12PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> So really, it sounds like a low hanging fruit: we don't really need to
>> write much more testing code code nor do we have to refactor existing
>> test suites. We just need to make sure the right tests are running on
>> stable kernels. I really want to clarify what each subsystem sees as
>> "sufficient" (and have that documented somewhere).
>
> kernel.ci and 0-day and Linaro are starting to add the fs and mm tests
> to their test suites to address these issues (I think 0-day already has
> many of them). So this is happening, but not quite obvious. I know I
> keep asking Linaro about this :(
We're working on investments for LDCG[0] in 2019 that include kernel CI
changes for server use cases. Please keep us informed of what you folks
ultimately want to see, and I'll pass on to the steering committee too.
Ultimately I've been pushing for a kernel 0-day project for Arm. That's
probably going to require a lot of duplicated effort since the original
0-day project isn't open, but creating an open one could help everyone.
Jon.
[0] Linaro DataCenter Group (formerly "LEG")
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-20 4:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-12 17:00 [LSF/MM TOPIC] FS, MM, and stable trees Sasha Levin
2019-02-12 21:32 ` Steve French
2019-02-13 7:20 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-02-13 7:37 ` Greg KH
2019-02-13 9:01 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-02-13 9:18 ` Greg KH
2019-02-13 19:25 ` Sasha Levin
2019-02-13 19:52 ` Greg KH
2019-02-13 20:14 ` James Bottomley
2019-02-15 1:50 ` Sasha Levin
2019-02-15 2:48 ` James Bottomley
2019-02-16 18:28 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-02-21 15:34 ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-21 18:52 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-03-20 3:46 ` Jon Masters [this message]
2019-03-20 5:06 ` Greg KH
2019-03-20 6:14 ` Jon Masters
2019-03-20 6:28 ` Greg KH
2019-03-20 6:32 ` Jon Masters
2022-03-08 9:32 ` Amir Goldstein
2022-03-08 10:08 ` Greg KH
2022-03-08 11:04 ` Amir Goldstein
2022-03-08 15:42 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-03-08 19:06 ` Sasha Levin
2022-03-09 18:57 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-03-11 5:23 ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-03-11 12:00 ` Jan Kara
2022-03-11 20:52 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-03-11 22:04 ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-03-11 22:36 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-04-27 18:58 ` Amir Goldstein
2022-05-01 16:25 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-03-10 23:59 ` Steve French
2022-03-11 0:36 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-03-11 20:54 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-03-08 16:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-03-08 17:16 ` Amir Goldstein
2022-03-09 0:43 ` Dave Chinner
2022-03-09 18:41 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-03-09 18:49 ` Josef Bacik
2022-03-09 19:00 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-03-09 21:19 ` Josef Bacik
2022-03-10 1:28 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-03-10 18:51 ` Josef Bacik
2022-03-10 22:41 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-03-11 12:09 ` Jan Kara
2022-03-11 18:32 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-03-12 2:07 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-03-14 22:45 ` btrfs profiles to test was: (Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] FS, MM, and stable trees) Luis Chamberlain
2022-03-15 14:23 ` Josef Bacik
2022-03-15 17:42 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-03-29 20:24 ` [LSF/MM TOPIC] FS, MM, and stable trees Amir Goldstein
2022-04-10 15:11 ` Amir Goldstein
2022-03-08 10:54 ` Jan Kara
2022-03-09 0:02 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=79d10599-70d2-7d06-1cee-6e52d36233bf@jonmasters.org \
--to=jcm@jonmasters.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).