From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D794DC33CAF for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B547324676 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728731AbgAWNLP (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jan 2020 08:11:15 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:31001 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726605AbgAWNLO (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jan 2020 08:11:14 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2020 05:11:14 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,354,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="220660992" Received: from jnikula-mobl3.fi.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.237.66.161]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2020 05:11:08 -0800 From: Jani Nikula To: Christophe Leroy , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Linus Torvalds , Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] uaccess: Tell user_access_begin() if it's for a write or not In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:11:05 +0200 Message-ID: <8736c6e2s6.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 23 Jan 2020, Christophe Leroy wrote: > On 32 bits powerPC (book3s/32), only write accesses to user are > protected and there is no point spending time on unlocking for reads. > > On 64 bits powerpc (book3s/64 at least), access can be granted > read only, write only or read/write. > > Add an argument to user_access_begin() to tell when it's for write and > return an opaque key that will be used by user_access_end() to know > what was done by user_access_begin(). IMHO an opaque key is a prime example of a case where the use of an opaque typedef is warranted. Nobody needs to know or care it's specifically an unsigned long. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center