From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jlayton@kernel.org, neilb@suse.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locks: add locks_move_blocks in posix_lock_inode
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 09:10:31 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dwq757c.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200601091616.34137-1-yangerkun@huawei.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1171 bytes --]
On Mon, Jun 01 2020, yangerkun wrote:
> We forget to call locks_move_blocks in posix_lock_inode when try to
> process same owner and different types.
>
This patch is not necessary.
The caller of posix_lock_inode() must calls locks_delete_block() on
'request', and that will remove all blocked request and retry them.
So calling locks_move_blocks() here is at most an optimization. Maybe
it is a useful one.
What led you to suggesting this patch? Were you just examining the
code, or was there some problem that you were trying to solve?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
> Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/locks.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> index b8a31c1c4fff..36bd2c221786 100644
> --- a/fs/locks.c
> +++ b/fs/locks.c
> @@ -1282,6 +1282,7 @@ static int posix_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request,
> if (!new_fl)
> goto out;
> locks_copy_lock(new_fl, request);
> + locks_move_blocks(new_fl, request);
> request = new_fl;
> new_fl = NULL;
> locks_insert_lock_ctx(request, &fl->fl_list);
> --
> 2.21.3
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-01 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-01 9:16 [PATCH] locks: add locks_move_blocks in posix_lock_inode yangerkun
2020-06-01 23:10 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2020-06-02 13:49 ` yangerkun
2020-06-02 15:56 ` Jeff Layton
2020-06-03 1:22 ` yangerkun
2020-06-03 10:34 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877dwq757c.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).