Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix ELF / FDPIC ELF core dumping, and use mmap_sem properly in there

[ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)]

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:

> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 7:10 AM Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org> wrote:

>> > Most of that file goes back to pre-git days. And most of the commits
>> > since are not so much about binfmt_flat, as they are about cleanups or
>> > changes elsewhere where binfmt_flat was just a victim.
>>
>> I'll have a look at this.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> Quick hack test shows moving setup_new_exec(bprm) to be just before
>> install_exec_creds(bprm) works fine for the static binaries case.
>> Doing the flush_old_exec(bprm) there too crashed out - I'll need to
>> dig into that to see why.
>
> Just moving setup_new_exec() would at least allow us to then join the
> two together, and just say "setup_new_exec() does the credential
> installation too".

But it is only half a help if we allow failure points between
flush_old_exec and install_exec_creds.

Greg do things work acceptably if install_exec_creds is moved to right
after setup_new_exec? (patch below)

Looking at the code in load_flat_file after setup_new_exec it looks like
the kinds of things that in binfmt_elf.c we do after install_exec_creds
(aka vm_map).  So I think we want install_exec_creds sooner, instead
of setup_new_exec later.

> But if it's true that nobody really uses the odd flat library support
> any more and there are no testers, maybe we should consider ripping it
> out...

I looked a little deeper and there is another reason to think about
ripping out the flat library loader.  The code is recursive, and
supports a maximum of 4 shared libraries in the entire system.

load_flat_binary
	load_flat_file
        	calc_reloc
                	load_flat_shared_libary
                        	load_flat_file
                                	....

I am mystified with what kind of system can survive with a grand total
of 4 shared libaries.  I think my a.out slackware system that I ran on
my i486 had more shared libraries.

Having read just a bit more it is definitely guaranteed (by the code)
that the first time load_flat_file is called id 0 will be used (aka id 0
is guaranteed to be the binary), and the ids 1, 2, 3 and 4 will only be
used if a relocation includes that id to reference an external shared
library.  That part of the code is drop dead simple.

---

This is what I was thinking about applying.

diff --git a/fs/binfmt_flat.c b/fs/binfmt_flat.c
index 831a2b25ba79..1a1d1fcb893f 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_flat.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_flat.c
@@ -541,6 +541,7 @@ static int load_flat_file(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
 		/* OK, This is the point of no return */
 		set_personality(PER_LINUX_32BIT);
 		setup_new_exec(bprm);
+		install_exec_creds(bprm);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -963,8 +964,6 @@ static int load_flat_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 		}
 	}
 
-	install_exec_creds(bprm);
-
 	set_binfmt(&flat_format);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMU