From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+83e12cf81d2c14842146@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
bfields@fieldses.org, jlayton@kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: general protection fault in __x86_indirect_thunk_rbx
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 17:07:59 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lg187oao.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000000000000b3976c0584940e6e@google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1326 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 20 2019, syzbot wrote:
> syzbot has bisected this bug to:
>
> commit dee160df820de41ff2f59a715643680822a0ab06
> Author: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
> Date: Mon Nov 5 01:30:47 2018 +0000
>
> locks: use properly initialized file_lock when unlocking.
This commit did not make it to mainline.
It was replaced by
Commit d6367d624137 ("fs/locks: use properly initialized file_lock when unlocking.")
which added a call to locks_init_lock() in flock_make_lock().
NeilBrown
>
> bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=13f39fd7200000
> start commit: dee160df locks: use properly initialized file_lock when un..
> git tree: linux-next
> final crash: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=100b9fd7200000
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17f39fd7200000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=caa433e1c8778437
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=83e12cf81d2c14842146
> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=15bd9447400000
> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=1121d82b400000
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+83e12cf81d2c14842146@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: dee160df ("locks: use properly initialized file_lock when
> unlocking.")
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-21 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-07 5:03 general protection fault in __x86_indirect_thunk_rbx syzbot
2018-11-07 7:47 ` syzbot
2019-03-21 5:32 ` syzbot
2019-03-21 6:07 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2019-03-21 6:16 ` Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lg187oao.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+83e12cf81d2c14842146@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).