linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [ATTEND] many topics
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 06:34:29 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mvehd0ze.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170123170924.ubx2honzxe7g34on@thunk.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1928 bytes --]

On Tue, Jan 24 2017, Theodore Ts'o wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 10:05:44PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> 
>> I don't have a clear picture in my mind of when Java promotes objects
>> from nursery to tenure
>
> It's typically on the order of minutes.   :-)
>
>> ... which is not too different from my lack of
>> understanding of what the MM layer considers "temporary" :-)  Is it
>> acceptable usage to allocate a SCSI command (guaranteed to be freed
>> within 30 seconds) from the temporary area?  Or should it only be used
>> for allocations where the thread of control is not going to sleep between
>> allocation and freeing?
>
> What the mm folks have said is that it's to prevent fragmentation.  If
> that's the optimization, whether or not you the process is allocating
> the memory sleeps for a few hundred milliseconds, or even seconds, is
> really in the noise compared with the average lifetime of an inode in
> the inode cache, or a page in the page cache....
>
> Why do you think it matters whether or not we sleep?  I've not heard
> any explanation for the assumption for why this might be important.

Because "TEMPORARY" implies a limit to the amount of time, and sleeping
is the thing that causes a process to take a large amount of time.  It
seems like an obvious connection to me.

Imagine I want to allocate a large contiguous region in the
ZONE_MOVEABLE region.  I find a mostly free region, so I just need to
move those last few pages.  If there is a limit on how long a process
can sleep while holding an allocation from ZONE_MOVEABLE, then I know
how long, at most, I need to wait before those pages become either free
or movable.  If those processes can wait indefinitely, then I might have
to wait indefinitely to get this large region.

"temporary" doesn't mean anything without a well defined time limit.

But maybe I completely misunderstand.

NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-23 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-18  5:49 [ATTEND] many topics Matthew Wilcox
2017-01-18 10:13 ` [Lsf-pc] " Jan Kara
2017-01-18 11:26   ` willy
2017-01-18 13:32 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-19 11:05   ` willy
2017-01-19 11:33     ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-19 11:52       ` willy
2017-01-19 12:11         ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-21  0:11           ` NeilBrown
2017-01-21 13:16             ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-01-22  4:45               ` NeilBrown
2017-01-23  6:05                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-01-23  6:30                   ` NeilBrown
2017-01-23  6:35                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-01-23 17:09                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-01-23 19:34                     ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-01-25 14:36                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-25 20:36                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-01-25 21:15                           ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-25 23:19                         ` NeilBrown
2017-01-26  8:56                           ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-26 21:20                             ` NeilBrown
2017-01-27 13:12                               ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mvehd0ze.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).