From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F589C43331 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 17:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309902077D for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 17:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388164AbgDBRHe convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:07:34 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:54828 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731608AbgDBRHe (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:07:34 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jK3JR-0000YP-GP; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:07:29 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jK3JQ-0007EN-Ov; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:07:29 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Alexey Gladkov Cc: LKML , Kernel Hardening , Linux API , Linux FS Devel , Linux Security Module , Akinobu Mita , Alexander Viro , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Daniel Micay , Djalal Harouni , "Dmitry V . Levin" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , "J . Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov , David Howells References: <20200327172331.418878-1-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> <20200327172331.418878-9-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> <87d08pkh4u.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200402165156.4mzenof4upvtd3lv@comp-core-i7-2640m-0182e6> Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 12:04:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20200402165156.4mzenof4upvtd3lv@comp-core-i7-2640m-0182e6> (Alexey Gladkov's message of "Thu, 2 Apr 2020 18:51:56 +0200") Message-ID: <87r1x5iztf.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-XM-SPF: eid=1jK3JQ-0007EN-Ov;;;mid=<87r1x5iztf.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX19JB6md/ag4gch1HCHlHqnPcaDKiSdq078= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 8/9] proc: use human-readable values for hidehid X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Alexey Gladkov writes: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 11:05:21AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Alexey Gladkov writes: >> >> > The hidepid parameter values are becoming more and more and it becomes >> > difficult to remember what each new magic number means. >> >> In principle I like this change. In practice I think you have just >> broken ABI compatiblity with the new mount ABI. >> >> In particular the following line seems broken. >> >> > diff --git a/fs/proc/root.c b/fs/proc/root.c >> > index dbcd96f07c7a..ba782d6e6197 100644 >> > --- a/fs/proc/root.c >> > +++ b/fs/proc/root.c >> > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ enum proc_param { >> > >> > static const struct fs_parameter_spec proc_fs_parameters[] = { >> > fsparam_u32("gid", Opt_gid), >> > - fsparam_u32("hidepid", Opt_hidepid), >> > + fsparam_string("hidepid", Opt_hidepid), >> > fsparam_string("subset", Opt_subset), >> > {} >> > }; >> >> As I read fs_parser.c fs_param_is_u32 handles string inputs and turns them >> into numbers, and it handles binary numbers. However fs_param_is_string >> appears to only handle strings. It appears to have not capacity to turn >> raw binary numbers into strings. > > I use result only with hidepid_u32_spec and nobody modifies param->string. > I do not use internal functions here. > > I don’t follow how a raw number can get here ? I may be wrong but last I looked you can input raw numbers using the new mount api. I have most of the details paged out at the moment, but I believe that is why when you set a parameter in the new mount api it takes a type. >> So I think we probably need to fix fs_param_is_string to raw binary >> numbers before we can safely make this change to fs/proc/root.c >> >> David am I reading the fs_parser.c code correctly? If I am are you ok >> with a change like the above? Eric