linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] fs: avoid softlockups in s_inodes iterators
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:36:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8af0e23f-b7a4-d046-3ebd-fb30c3f18700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a26fae1d-a741-6eb1-b460-968a3b97e238@redhat.com>

On 10/14/19 4:30 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Anything that walks all inodes on sb->s_inodes list without rescheduling
> risks softlockups.
> 
> Previous efforts were made in 2 functions, see:
> 
> c27d82f fs/drop_caches.c: avoid softlockups in drop_pagecache_sb()
> ac05fbb inode: don't softlockup when evicting inodes
> 
> but there hasn't been an audit of all walkers, so do that now.  This
> also consistently moves the cond_resched() calls to the bottom of each
> loop in cases where it already exists.
> 
> One loop remains: remove_dquot_ref(), because I'm not quite sure how
> to deal with that one w/o taking the i_lock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>

Whoops, cc: Jan & Josef as on original, sorry.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-14 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-14 21:30 [PATCH V2] fs: avoid softlockups in s_inodes iterators Eric Sandeen
2019-10-14 21:36 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2019-10-15  7:37 ` Jan Kara
2019-10-16  2:36   ` Eric Sandeen
2019-10-16  9:42     ` Jan Kara
2019-10-16 13:23       ` Eric Sandeen
2019-10-16 13:49         ` Jan Kara
2019-10-16 14:39           ` Eric Sandeen
2019-10-16 15:26             ` Eric Sandeen
2019-10-16 15:35               ` Jan Kara
2019-10-16 17:11 ` [PATCH 2/1] fs: call fsnotify_sb_delete after evict_inodes Eric Sandeen
2019-10-17  8:39   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8af0e23f-b7a4-d046-3ebd-fb30c3f18700@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).