linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: "Stefan Bühler" <source@stbuehler.de>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: io_uring: submission error handling
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:02:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ce7be42-4183-b441-9a26-6b3441ed5fef@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66fb4ed7-a267-1b0b-d609-af34d9e1aa54@stbuehler.de>

On 4/27/19 9:50 AM, Stefan Bühler wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 24.04.19 00:07, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 4/23/19 2:31 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> 1. An error for a submission should be returned as completion for that
>>>> submission.  Please don't break my main event loop with strange error
>>>> codes just because a single operation is broken/not supported/...
>>>
>>> So that's the case I was referring to above. We can just make that change,
>>> there's absolutely no reason to have errors passed back through a different
>>> channel.
>>
>> Thinking about this a bit more, and I think the current approach is the
>> best one. The issue is that only submission side events tied to an sqe
>> can return an cqe, the rest have to be returned through the system call
>> value. So I think it's cleaner to keep it as-is, honestly.
> 
> Not sure we're talking about the same.
> 
> I'm talking about the errors returned by io_submit_sqe: io_submit_sqes
> (called by the SQ thread) calls io_cqring_add_event if there was an
> error, but io_ring_submit (called by io_uring_enter) doesn't: instead,
> if there were successfully submitted entries before, it will just return
> those (and "undo" the current SQE), otherwise it will return the error,
> which will then be returned by io_uring_enter.
> 
> But if I get an error from io_uring_enter I have no idea whether it was
> some generic error (say EINVAL for broken flags or EBADF for a
> non-io-uring filedescriptor) or an error related to a single submission.
> 
> I think io_ring_submit should call io_cqring_add_event on errors too
> (like io_submit_sqes), and not stop handling submissions (and never
> return an error).
> 
> Maybe io_cqring_add_event could then even be moved to io_submit_sqe and
> just return whether the job is already done or not (io_submit_sqes
> returns the new "inflight" jobs, and io_ring_submit the total number of
> submitted jobs).

I think we are talking about the same thing, actually. See below patch.
This changes it so that any error that occurs on behalf of a specific
sqe WILL trigger a completion event, instead of returning it through
io_uring_enter(). io_uring_enter() can still return -ERROR for errors
that aren't specific to an sqe.

I think this is what you had in mind?

Totally untested, will do so now.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-30 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-23 19:06 io_uring: not good enough for release Stefan Bühler
2019-04-23 20:31 ` Jens Axboe
2019-04-23 22:07   ` Jens Axboe
2019-04-24 16:09     ` Jens Axboe
2019-04-27 16:05       ` io_uring: RWF_NOWAIT support Stefan Bühler
2019-04-27 18:34         ` [PATCH v1 1/1] [io_uring] fix handling SQEs requesting NOWAIT Stefan Bühler
2019-04-30 15:40           ` Jens Axboe
2019-04-27 15:50     ` io_uring: submission error handling Stefan Bühler
2019-04-30 16:02       ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2019-04-30 16:15         ` Jens Axboe
2019-04-30 18:15           ` Stefan Bühler
2019-04-30 18:42             ` Jens Axboe
2019-05-01 11:49               ` [PATCH v1 1/1] [io_uring] don't stall on submission errors Stefan Bühler
2019-05-01 12:43                 ` Jens Axboe
2019-04-27 21:07   ` io_uring: closing / release Stefan Bühler
2019-05-11 16:26     ` Stefan Bühler
2019-04-28 15:54   ` io_uring: O_NONBLOCK/IOCB_NOWAIT/RWF_NOWAIT mess Stefan Bühler
2019-05-11 16:34     ` Stefan Bühler
2019-05-11 16:57       ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: RWF flags override default IOCB flags from file flags Stefan Bühler
2019-05-11 16:57         ` [PATCH 2/5] tcp: handle SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK in tcp_splice_read Stefan Bühler
2019-05-11 16:57         ` [PATCH 3/5] pipe: use IOCB_NOWAIT instead of O_NONBLOCK Stefan Bühler
2019-05-11 16:57         ` [PATCH 4/5] socket: " Stefan Bühler
2019-05-11 16:57         ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: use FMODE_NOWAIT to detect files supporting IOCB_NOWAIT Stefan Bühler
2019-05-03  9:47   ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: restructure io_{read,write} control flow Stefan Bühler
2019-05-03  9:47     ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: punt to workers if file doesn't support async Stefan Bühler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8ce7be42-4183-b441-9a26-6b3441ed5fef@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=source@stbuehler.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).